http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42687789
The fact that Man U are prepared to pay such a sum this window for a player who will be out of contract at the end of the season can only, I assume, be seen as a worthwhile investment to secure Champions League football?! The sums being thrown around in English football really are hideous and have completely turned me off watching any football in the EPL. Scottish football may be pretty average but at least you can still feel some sort of connection to your club.
Results 1 to 30 of 35
-
15-01-2018 11:22 AM #1
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 5,644
Sanchez: £35 miliion for a player who can move for free in the summer
-
15-01-2018 11:28 AM #2
It's silly money but it'll be partly because he is still available to play in the FA Cup and Champions League. There will also be an element of paying it to stop him having lots of options in the summer and becoming more difficult to sign him.
Saying all that, Sanchez is quite within his rights to refuse to move and sit tight for 5 months, if he has set his mind on Man City or someone else.
-
15-01-2018 11:32 AM #3
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 77
- Posts
- 2,343
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Think that's the most obvious reason for signing him now.
-
15-01-2018 11:34 AM #4
I don't feel a connection to Scottish footballers any more or less than English ones on the real silly money. They all operate in a different realm from the rest of us working normal jobs.
In the current climate the money they are willing to pay for him seems normal, theres not really any going back so continuing to moan about it doesn't get you anywhere. Football has already gone down this slippery slope and there is no way back up it.
-
15-01-2018 11:38 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jul 2017
- Posts
- 2,287
Biggest club in the world sign one of the worlds best. Money is no option.
-
15-01-2018 11:43 AM #6This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2018 12:11 PM #7This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2018 12:27 PM #8
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- kirkcaldy
- Posts
- 11,538
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2018 12:47 PM #9
Player power, agents, huge TV money, non footballing owners, China and massive costs if you fail to reach top 4. In Man United's case, for example, its written into sponsors contracts. So what looks crazy makes some sense. Mourinho has them second but is getting pelters from the media and crazy fans.
Not pretty but the transfer fees are already well over any sensible debate. Sadly thats the reality unless the TV money stops.
Next week will have something as daft. And who is more stupid - Man United or Arsenal?
-
15-01-2018 12:51 PM #10
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 2,519
If United don't pay up the £35 million, they risk having to try to convince him to sign in the summer when they might not even have Champions League football the following season. I'd imagine he'll be going to City if he doesn't move this month.
-
-
15-01-2018 01:28 PM #12
- Join Date
- Jul 2017
- Posts
- 2,287
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2018 01:34 PM #13
If he had 4 years left on his contract he's a £100m plus player, i'd wait until the summer if i was him, and take the £50m signing on fee and £400-500k a week wages.
Greedy, you bet, but why not?
-
-
15-01-2018 05:15 PM #15
Sure I heard on SSN earlier today that of the £35m fee, £5m will go to agent. Scandalous!!
Having said that, tying up a top class player for 2-4 years at that price is probably a “bargain” in the EPL. SSN also reporting that Man City only prepared to pay £20m now.
-
15-01-2018 05:23 PM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2018 05:30 PM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2018 05:30 PM #18
They were talking about this on MOTD2 yesterday. Ozil and Wilshire could be away pretty soon too. That amounts to approx. £150 million that Arsenal could end up not getting. But sadly, the real problem is Wenger. Maybe he thought he could persuade these players to stay? That team, without those players, looks really average, and as far as Wenger's situation goes, it's highly unusual to have a situation where the employee dictates the terms of employment rather than the owners. They need a new manager, and I hate saying that, because I remember watching the 'Invincibles' go through the season unbeaten- 1 of the best teams I've ever seen in British football.
-
15-01-2018 07:44 PM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2018 08:03 PM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think at least some of the time there will be a domino effect, particularly at the level of attacking players of that stature, where the market is finite.There's only one thing better than a Hibs calendar and that's two Hibs calendars
-
15-01-2018 08:04 PM #21
How does having lots of money equate to souless?
Nothing wrong with the EPL. I get to see world class players and some quality games.
I really don’t get, or believe folk when they say they’d rather watch St Mirren on Alba! If that’s the case you’re missing out on some cracking football.
The money paid now is irrelevant. Most top players will soon go for 100m +.
-
15-01-2018 08:11 PM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2018 08:16 PM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
As for world class players, there's no more than 4 or 5 in that entire league.
-
15-01-2018 08:31 PM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I can honestly say, if the Dundee derby was on TV the same time as the Manchester derby, and I had to choose, It's the Dundee one all day long for me, maybe not a few years ago though.
-
15-01-2018 08:33 PM #25
Manchester C no longer interested in Sanchez. His meagre £400,000 a week demand apparently too high.
-
15-01-2018 09:09 PM #26This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2018 09:27 PM #27
Premier League was a bit dull for a few years but I think this season has had some cracking games so far, few very exciting teams to watch on their day. Think City and Liverpool will go far in the CL.
-
15-01-2018 09:29 PM #28
Thing is, if a lot of the top players in the EPL played for Barca or Real then everyone would say they were world class!!
If there’s a live SPFL game I’ll watch that over the EPL every time but other than that I’ll watch an English game if it’s on.
I can barely stomach watching Hibs on Alba let alone some lower league game!
-
16-01-2018 12:03 AM #29This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Games between the big sides have been good this season, Arsenal 3 - 3 Liverpool
Arsenal 2 - 2 Chelsea
Liverpool 4 - 3 City
Arsenal 1 - 3 United
City 5 - 0 Liverpool
Spurs 4 - 1 Liverpool
-
16-01-2018 01:02 AM #30
I don’t think that City really wanted to sign him in this window in the first place. When they failed inter last window, .the plan was always to hope to get him in the Summer on a free. There was concern about disrupting the squad who were doing pretty well without him. Those with long memories may recall when Rodney Marsh signed for City in the early 1970s and arguable cost City the League title.
Then with the deteriorating relationship between Sanchez and his Arsenal team mates coupled with the injury to Gabriel de Jesus pushed City into making a bid in case he moved elsewhere.
Since the injury of Jesus is not as bad as first feared and the astronomical sums mentioned of £30 million plus another £5 million for the agent and wages being demanded killed off the interest. I suspect that if the current moves break down, City may think again in the Summer.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks