Hearts penalty?

[-Jonesy-]

Hardly surprising comfort blanket from the team that still think 5-1 means anything to anyone...deluded fuds

[davhibby]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Lot of people saying its not a pen and then a few (including me) saying it is a pen. Just goes to show hard a decision these things are at times. Would have been a right kick in the balls had they got it though.

It's not a pen in a million years though. If that's a penalty there would be 2/3 penalties for handball every week. He tries to move his arm out the way and he has very little time to do it. This and the supposed offside for the Shaw goal haven't been discussed properly anywhere but the Hearts fans think if they keep going on about it'll become the truth

[Hibernia&Alba]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hardly surprising comfort blanket from the team that still think 5-1 means anything to anyone...deluded fuds

It does to me, but let's not drag that up again. They'll keep

[WHAM]

Never a penalty in a million years. Unintentional handball and the ball was going out of play! Different if it was preventing a goal scoring opportunity.

[Joe6-2]

Oops, hand to ball 😂

[Eyrie]

I wouldn't have claimed for it if that had happened in their box.

Typical Hearts clutching at straws.

[nonshinyfinish]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never a penalty. Referees had one of those objectives at the start of the season where they make one rule clear of how it is going to be governed through the season. They advised that if a ball deflects/takes a sudden change of direction that it won’t be given. Last night the ball was crossed in and took a nick off a Hearts players head. That’s not a penalty.

Interesting. Was there any caveat attached to it? I.e., if the ball changes direction but then the player blatantly sticks his hand up to stop it?

[Steve20]

The people saying it was a penalty are just wanting to come across as different for the sake of it. NEVER A PENALTY in a million years. You’d have to be some sort of idiot to think it was.

[kaimendhibs]

I wouldnt give them a penalty if big Marv took Walkers head off with a kung fu kick. The claim for handball against Lewis is baws and a diversionary tactic

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[Tornadoes70]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It's not a pen in a million years though. If that's a penalty there would be 2/3 penalties for handball every week. He tries to move his arm out the way and he has very little time to do it. This and the supposed offside for the Shaw goal haven't been discussed properly anywhere but the Hearts fans think if they keep going on about it'll become the truth

There's certainly a fair few of these fools who just can't handle the truth. The deluded doesn't begin to describe some of them.

Mon the Cabbage 10 in a row beckons!!!

[007]

Ahead of the defender but not ahead of the ball as Boyle kicks it.

IMG_20171229_020019.jpg

Not clear from the shot below but if you watch it slowed down you can see it actually slightly touches Goncalves' hand first. It then touches Bartley's arm twice and then Goncalves' arm twice.
IMG_20171229_021704.jpg

No need to do one of Lewis's, there's no doubt it touches his arm but it is ball to hand. After the flick on he has next to no time to move his arm out of the way and you can see he did try to move it away but the ball had already hit it. No advantage was gained as their were no Hearts players that would've got the ball.

Also, shot below (again is clearer when seen played back in slo-mo) is when Walker clobbers Boyle with his fist which should have been his 2nd yellow (not to mention others tackles which also could've been), so he shouldn't have been on the pitch to take the free kick which led to the ball hitting Lewis's arm.

IMG_20171229_024011.jpg