Stadiums need to be in big cities. Stirling just doesn’t have the infrastructure to support a stadium. Like it or not, a lot of Scotland crowds are boosted by Glaswegians going along at the last minute. If it was in Stirling that would be lost.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Results 91 to 99 of 99
-
10-11-2017 12:35 PM #91
-
10-11-2017 12:36 PM #92This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
10-11-2017 12:39 PM #93
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Posts
- 1,959
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Just a personal preference mate.
-
10-11-2017 01:58 PM #94This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
10-11-2017 08:03 PM #96
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 2,881
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
11-11-2017 04:25 PM #97
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 731
Was at the egg chasing today and the set up for rugby is far in advance of football imo. The stadium compared to hampden is night and day. People say it's miles from the pitch but you could clearly see the football lines today and behind the goals especially it's is no further away than hampden if not closer. In terms of the set up outside it is night and day. Lots of food and drink outlets and plenty going on such as big screens and live bands. I know the client at rugby is different from football, but there is a lot football could learn.
-
11-11-2017 04:38 PM #98This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
11-11-2017 04:51 PM #99
Would be a welcome discussion though. When Hunbrox or Celtc Park have been used instead of Hampden it is hard now to assume that the main selling point is that they are in Glasgow. If we had played Engerlund at Murrayfield and it meant another 15,000 tickets that would have all been sold, there would not have been a lot of complaints IMO.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks