Expecting him to be cited for grabbing Jack by the throat. If so, fair enough. Think he was lucky there. However. If that is the case will Dorrans be cited for doing exactly the same thing to Slivka for the tackle that led to the whole incident?
Results 1 to 30 of 74
Thread: Stokes
-
15-08-2017 11:52 AM #1
Stokes
-
-
15-08-2017 11:55 AM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
GGTTH
-
15-08-2017 11:55 AM #4
I don't think Stokes will be cited, if he is, then there's gonna be a lengthy queue on the naughty step at Hampden from just one game.
-
15-08-2017 11:56 AM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-08-2017 11:56 AM #6This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
15-08-2017 11:59 AM #8
From what I can work out, Stokes was booked for the incident with Tavernier, but wasn't punished for the incident with Jack. I think he'll get pulled up for that.
Dorrans was booked in that incident wasn't he? In which case I cant see any further action taken against him.
And then there's Jack, Rangers have appealed but I honestly can't see how they'll win it. They probably will tho
-
15-08-2017 12:01 PM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Not sure if Dorrans was booked for that Callum.
-
15-08-2017 12:04 PM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Jack committed 2 fouls in the same incident, hands round McGeough and then head butt on Stokes
If you look again at the 1st incident with Stokes early doors where he was booked, Cardosa practically stamps on him, then grabs him round the neck, and didn't get booked for the incident.
If they cite Stokes, Cardosa should get the same
-
-
15-08-2017 12:06 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-08-2017 12:10 PM #13
So, did Dorrans get booked for his part in the Ryan Jack incident? If he did then fair enough. But then surely that means that Stokes can only get a retrospective yellow for doing exactly the same thing? They wouldn't be able to justify a longer ban than one game for him if Dorrans only got off with a yellow.
-
15-08-2017 12:19 PM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-08-2017 12:21 PM #15
I have no idea where you start and where you finish punishing folk for these skirmishes.
By the letter of the law, should you not get into big trouble as soon as you raise your hands? If so, it should have ended up about 3 a side.
That was a difficult game to referee. The referee called it as he saw it at the time, but with the benefit of multiple replays from multiple angles you can see he got some decisions wrong.
Stokes will be very lucky to avoid punishment though imo.
-
15-08-2017 12:40 PM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-08-2017 12:47 PM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I genuinely didn't know.
So - the raising of hands and "handbags" (which happens from time to time) is ok - it must be deemed violent conduct for a red card to be shown?
-
15-08-2017 12:51 PM #18
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 10,659
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Very different if it was off the ball and out of sight.
-
15-08-2017 12:54 PM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Last edited by Iggy Pope; 15-08-2017 at 12:57 PM.
-
15-08-2017 01:04 PM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-08-2017 01:12 PM #21This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
As for the Stokes thing. You're right, it's human nature to want to protect oneself against someone coming at you like raging bull. No further punishment for Stokes. All seem by the ref during the course of the game.
-
15-08-2017 01:33 PM #22
If they were going to be pulled up for it then it would've happened by now surely.
United we stand here....
-
15-08-2017 01:36 PM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-08-2017 01:52 PM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-08-2017 02:02 PM #25
After the initial tussle between Stokes and Taviener you can see Ryan Jack getting involved and grabbing Stokes by the throat on the BBC highlights. Its exactly on the 56 second mark. Jack got involved first and thats why Stokes and him came together the second time. Nobody has commented on the from The Rangers side have they......imbeciles!
-
15-08-2017 05:12 PM #26
Good amateurs
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-08-2017 05:22 PM #27
Doesn't he have to be cited by Tuesday if it's going to happen?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
15-08-2017 05:29 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
-
15-08-2017 05:35 PM #29This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-08-2017 05:37 PM #30
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Age
- 81
- Posts
- 13,828
The referee will say that he did deal with it at the time and sent the other guy off.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks