So, women can (and do) comment on the attractiveness of male players, but men cannot do likewise about women? That's not very open minded now, is it?This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk
Results 91 to 120 of 155
Thread: C'mon Oor Bonnie Lassie's!!
-
19-07-2017 09:28 PM #91NamelessLeft by mutual consent!
-
19-07-2017 09:30 PM #92NamelessLeft by mutual consent!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk
-
19-07-2017 09:34 PM #93
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- kirkcaldy
- Posts
- 11,535
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
19-07-2017 09:40 PM #94This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
19-07-2017 09:42 PM #95This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
19-07-2017 09:46 PM #96This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Looking for something to make a negative out of for me!
-
19-07-2017 10:01 PM #97NamelessLeft by mutual consent!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It's nice to see that you picked out the minority of negative comments, and bypassed the positive ones - Pretty Boys post on this thread is more indicative of the positivity towards womens football on this board I feel, than the perceived "depressing slating" that you seem to have read.
Anyway, I share your hope that this tournament can be a positive experience for our ladies.
I also hope England get to the final, so I can see more of Ms Duggan on my telly box
Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk
-
19-07-2017 10:07 PM #98
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 22,639
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
19-07-2017 10:09 PM #99This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
19-07-2017 10:09 PM #100
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 22,639
Bottom line is England are a professional team. Scotland are miles away from that level and are missing the only world class player they have. The 2 CHs for Scotland are awful examples and it's beyond me why they would get picked.
-
19-07-2017 10:11 PM #101NamelessLeft by mutual consent!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk
-
-
23-07-2017 04:09 PM #103This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
And 2 Hibbys playing!
-
-
23-07-2017 05:05 PM #105NamelessLeft by mutual consent!
A wee bit disappointed with Scotland today. We should expect to beat Portugal, so I expect better in the second half.
Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk
-
-
-
-
23-07-2017 05:56 PM #109
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 582
an
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Was about to say the manager Anna Signeuls has been in charge for far to long and the Sottish woman's team need new blood then I saw this below pity she couldn't have been in charge before more forward thinking and has done well in womans football.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39471314Last edited by edwards; 23-07-2017 at 05:58 PM.
-
23-07-2017 06:36 PM #110NamelessLeft by mutual consent!
Early home from another tournament, but still really impressed we qualified in the first place. Our domestic competition isn't up to much, but most of our team play in the top leagues. This proves that we are a country who produce talent, so now is the time for the SFA to build on this success and give our women the same backing as they do the men's game.
Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk
-
23-07-2017 06:41 PM #111This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I would be surprised if any country's association does that.
-
23-07-2017 06:54 PM #112NamelessLeft by mutual consent!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk
-
23-07-2017 07:12 PM #113
I am a great advocate of women's football and am happy with it being supported, both by Hibs at club level and by the SFA at International level, but the support given to it needs to be proportionate to participation rates to some extent and to the revenue that it raises itself or we risk damaging further the "golden goose" that drives the revenue for youth and women's football, the men's game.
I would be prepared to bet that most women and girls players are first attracted to the game by their support or that of their forbears support of it as a professional men's sport.
Women's football, at least in the UK (Scotland particularly) isn't sufficiently well publicised / supported (by folk actually attending games) to generate the participation levels we are now thankfully seeing.
If we were to take Hibs an example.
The Hibs women's team is far more successful than the Hibs men's team has been.
I don't think even the women's team most ardent activist would argue for an equal share of the revenue raised by Hibs.
Whether its liked or not, football is a commercial business at elite level regardless of whether it is the women's or men's game and the revenue given to either party will be to a large extent by their individual commercial activities, crowds and success.
I am happy that the Hibs women's team is supported by the club but would have real issues if I thought that that was to the severe detriment of the men's team which is what I predominantly follow. Thankfully I don't believe that to be the case.
-
23-07-2017 07:15 PM #114
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 22,639
FA invested 7.1m in grassroots girls football last year. SFA invested 700k. It's simply not ever going to happen in Scotland. Any kid who gets to a decent level will be away at 14/15.
-
23-07-2017 07:56 PM #115This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Unfortunately the issue is even more graphic in the men's game and SPL teams are struggling to compete wages wise with div 2 and conference teams
-
23-07-2017 08:30 PM #116madhatterLeft by mutual consent!
how Spain didn't get that penalty I'll never know...
and for the ref to just drop the ball to England's goalkeeper...very strange.
-
23-07-2017 08:33 PM #117This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-07-2017 08:38 PM #118
Shocking defensive performance especially for the second goal. Both CH's caught ball watching and too far up the park!
-
23-07-2017 08:49 PM #119This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I don't anyone is suggesting that Hibs support our Ladies team beyond any regard for commercial realities.
But I do believe that prudent investment is growing the game and you simply cannot ignore women's participation in football.
I also believe that the success of Hibs Ladies drives commercial revenue for the club as a whole - including attendance at our first team games.
Who knows where we will be in 20 years time but women's football has come a long, long way in 20 years. Who is to say this growth won't continue?
-
24-07-2017 09:57 AM #120This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Where we probably depart is on the point of what prudent investment is.
I would argue that Hibs have invested prudently in our women's team, the success of which is there for all to see.
As some of our big spending years of the past 30 years on the men's team have shown however throwing money at something isn't necessarily the answer.
I think there would be huge divisions in the support if our investment in the women's team were to grow to such an extent that it had a detrimental effect on the men's team.
I would however doubt that the women's team drive commercial revenue for the club other than possibly in greater attendances.
I think our having a women's team stops our being viewed negatively (as for example people viewed Muirfield Golf club when it wouldn't admit women members) but I have huge doubts that businesses invest monies into the club generally borne out of their support of the women's team.
Those monies would IMO, go and, would be better for the women's team going directly to them
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks