Maybe not over yet.

[Eyrie]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It all ends up with a team, executives and faithful innocent fans of clubs being punished for the crimes of a minority of tools. Better to let the police and the judiciary handle offenders than have guilt by association.

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

hun fans on 21/5 - a minority? The entire support, so they told us, were up to their knees in Fenian blood on about half-a-dozen occasions.

And the police and judiciary have done nothing about the offenders.

[Jack]

A solution to the marauding hun would be to add a good behaviour bond, of say a tenner, to the cost of their away tickets for every game. Any party songs from the banned list or vandalism like smashing up toilets and unless the miscreants are identified they all lose their tenner.

If that doesn't work then £20, £30, £40 until it does work.

Before anyone chips in with both sets of fans must be charged the same amount the price of the ticket is the same, the bond is an add-on.

[147lothian]

Just imagine if The Rangers got what they wanted and strict liability got implemented, imagine the thankless task it would be for The Rangers fans to police themselves and stop the sectarian singing at their matches, they would have more chance of rolling back the waves on the Clyde

[Ray_]

Sorry if already posted. I think this article is what most Scottish football fans think of Rangers and their statements.

http://www.scotzine.com/2016/10/rang...tish-football/

[jgl07]

For strict liability to work, the clubs concerned would have to be responsible for stewarding their own supporters.

[hibsdaft]

the govt statement are covering themselves should there be another incident. they want to be able to say, "we warned you, now we're going to act", rather than risk looking weak and reactive. that's all this statement is about IMO. what that action would entail is anyone's guess.