Love what Stubbs is doing, but voted Mowbray, this time next year if we've achieved promotion then I think it'll be the other way around!
View Poll Results: Mowbray or Stubbs
- Voters
- 170. You may not vote on this poll
-
Mowbray
47 27.65% -
Stubbs
123 72.35%
Results 61 to 90 of 91
Thread: Mowbray or Stubbs
-
25-11-2015 02:32 PM #61
-
25-11-2015 02:39 PM #62
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,777
Stubbs and Hibs are progressing but this team and manager are miles away from Mowbrays team at the moment.
-
25-11-2015 03:25 PM #63
I don't think you can make comparisons between the two. Mowbray inherited a group of talented players and added to it , Stubbs has assembled a group of talented players, but had little from the academy to work with. Mowbray was up against tougher opposition than Stubbs, but Stubbs has shown he can win games against tough opposition too.
Dunno where I'm going with this
-
25-11-2015 09:17 PM #64
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- borders
- Age
- 74
- Posts
- 901
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-11-2015 09:24 PM #65This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
25-11-2015 09:30 PM #67This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
We would kill for those finishes now.
I very much doubt Stubbs will emulate these finishes, as if he did he'd be away after the first success in the SPL.
I think we'd all be pleased he had achieved it, but sad he'd gone. It seems by bringing in managers like Mowbray and Stubbs, the minute they get any real success they will look to further their career back in England.
I suppose the secret is to keep the success going, maybe if this scenario turn out to be correct, Dempster hopefully has more success than the clown who's been doing it before.
-
25-11-2015 10:58 PM #68This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-11-2015 10:58 PM #69
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 38
- Posts
- 3,372
Mubbs
-
25-11-2015 11:39 PM #70This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-11-2015 12:20 AM #71
never said I liked him only pointing out a few important facts. his last 3 managers were a total disaster. the rot really set in, when Calderwood's possible move fell through
-
26-11-2015 01:17 AM #72
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 10,655
Mowbray inherited a great bunch of youngsters, added in a good mix of experienced players and delivered some of the best football and results seen at ER in decades. Hugely impressive.
Stubbs had a very different challenge - build a football club from the ground up after the most demoralising of seasons. His signings have been 100% spot on, and the way he dealt with the Allan affair was also impressive. It was a huge task that most managers would have shirked.
In football terms, there is only one winner - Mowbray. In the way they've gone about their own respective challenges, both have been impressive. If Stubbs manages Hibs to the title this season, ahead of the Huns, then that will have been even more impressive than anything Mowbray did at ER.
-
26-11-2015 12:19 PM #73This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Source: Tony Mowbray.
Extra brownie points:
Tony Mowbray took over Hibs during May 2004.................West Bromwich Albion appointed Mowbray as their manager on 13 October 2006. He didn't have any chances to win a cup with "his" team in that period between May 2004 and October 2006?
COLLINS won the cup. FACT. Irrefutable.
ENDOF
-
26-11-2015 12:52 PM #74This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-11-2015 12:59 PM #75
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- borders
- Age
- 74
- Posts
- 901
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-11-2015 01:41 PM #76
Stubbs for me.
Mowbray was set up to win and inherited a superb squad that was brimming with talent. He did well, particularly with some of the players that he added but in spite of all of that he still had some horrible results and the less said about the keepers the better.
Stubbs inherited an utter omnishambles of a club. We were arguably worse than we were at the final whistle of the playoff when he took over - Butcher had already started a cull by then and maybe Stubbs would have wanted to work with McPake, Thomson or Taiwo?
He had a credible side very quickly, if not a great one, and set about improving all aspects of the side. Unfortunately our lack of a cutting edge cost us last season but that can't disguise the drastic improvements we made.
This season we have improved further and imo look the real deal.
You can justifiably point out that we've not been in the top league during Stubbs' time at the club. But Hearts last year and Rangers this year have been tough opponents and sides of their quality would never normally be in this division so it is a slightly false position. In the head-to heads with these sides he has done well, as well as when we've faced teams from the league above in the cups.
Unfortunately I think he'll leave for the first decent offer down South but I'd love to see him stay at least until the end of this season and get a massive one over der hun.
-
27-11-2015 10:32 AM #77
My current vote is for mogga, but when alan gets us back in the prem and if we get into europe and stay in the top 6 then ill go for Stubbs !
-
27-11-2015 11:02 AM #78This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Mowbray inherited a squad after two years of cost-cutting, with most of the high earners gone or on their way.
Yes, the Golden Generation were just breaking through, but were raw.
We were playing percentage-based fitba under Bobby Williamson and it wasn't entertaining.
Mowbray and Venus coached the kids and encouraged them to express themselves. They signed Boozy, Murphy, Shiels and others, made ludicrously positive promises about how we would play attractive, attacking football and, even more ludicrously, started delivering on those promises from the off.
Boozy and Murphy, in particular, were absolutely critical to the way we played that first season. Without Mowbray, they wouldn't have joined Hibs.
Riordan and Brown, in particular, flourished under the new regime, encouraged to express themselves. O'Connor and Thomson had shown more the season before, but undoubtedly improved. Whittaker was trusted at RB and later Fletcher given his opportunity.
A classic bit of Hibs.net revisionism here, I think.
-
27-11-2015 01:44 PM #79This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
But given the choice, as a manager I'd be happy to inherit Riordan, Brown, Thomson, O'Connor, Whittaker and Fletcher any day of the week. Loads to work with and get the best out of. He even had Tam McManus and Grant Brebner who were decent players to choose to get rid of. There's no doubt Mowbray did well and added quality to supplement what was already there (Chris Hogg and Rob Jones probably deserve a mention as well).
But do you not agree that when we are comparing Mowbray and Stubbs it has to be acknowledged that it is reasonable common sense to take these talented players and allow them to express themselves?
Stubbs inherited the likes of James Collins, Michael Nelson, Ryan McGivern, Paul Heffernan, Alex Harris and Paul Cairney. They needed shown the door, not encouraged to express themselves. And in recruiting new players he was doing so from a club that was on it's knees in the First Division about to lock horns with Rangers and Hearts (therefore a big ask to get promoted at the first attempt). Mowbray was inviting players to the Premier League to play with an exciting and talented crop of youngsters.
-
27-11-2015 02:34 PM #80This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
A similar thing happened to Spurs under Jacques Santini - won their League Cup and then chucked the rest of the season.
Alex Ferguson said that winning was a habit. The proper response to winning a trophy was not to go on a bender and revel in it, but immediately focus on winning the next one.
For clubs starved of recent success, like us (and Spurs), this is a hard habit to acquire.
-
27-11-2015 08:08 PM #81
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 27,490
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
28-11-2015 08:05 AM #82This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
For consistent entertainment and quality football over a prolonged period the Mowbray era was the best since the Tornadoes.
If Stubbs can get us promoted and implement his football philosophy consistently and successfully across the whole of next season then that's the time to make any valid comparison.
There are a lot of similarities between Stubbs and Mowbray in how they want the game played but I think Stubbs has a pragmatic edge about him that Mowbray didn't. That might be the factor that hopefully has me voting for Stubbs if this poll appears again at the end of next season.
-
28-11-2015 10:20 AM #83This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
-
28-11-2015 10:33 AM #84This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
28-11-2015 11:08 AM #85This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
28-11-2015 11:38 AM #86This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
28-11-2015 05:48 PM #87
Mowbray for me. Sime great memories and the best I can remember as a Hibs fan.
Stubbs would have to win promotion this year to come close IMO. I like what he's doing though and he's probably the best we've had since TM left.
-
28-11-2015 06:33 PM #88This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
28-11-2015 06:43 PM #89This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
-
28-11-2015 06:44 PM #90
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 5,840
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Let us not forget that Mowbray made some very poor decisions. He got us playing some fantastic football, but we really struggled to break down some teams (i.e. Falkirk, ICT and Killie), Also, how could he play Gary Caldwell as right full back in that game at Hampden (semi final). He lost more games than won against Aberdeen, Hertz, ICT, Celtic, Killie and Rangers. Would we have won the LC with Tony in charge - not sure!!
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks