Fair dues, but If they get enough money they might start shopping in the Championship and the EPL, rather than in brain-dead fashion hoover up our players for relatively cheap, only to find that they don't quite make the grade at champions league level.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Results 31 to 60 of 85
Thread: Sums it up
-
28-08-2015 08:29 PM #31
-
-
28-08-2015 08:32 PM #33
Like I say dissolving the GFA IMHO is the only way forward, even if we get promotion next year when in your opinion would Hibs be serious title contenders?, in my mind never.........we need to break the rotten mould that is Scottish football to progress
-
28-08-2015 08:33 PM #34This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
28-08-2015 08:34 PM #35
keeping your best players and developing them within a team context usually ends up with a better result......
-
28-08-2015 08:37 PM #36This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
28-08-2015 08:38 PM #37This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
28-08-2015 08:46 PM #38This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I agree that Celtic at the moment are taking as many SPL players they can get. What I mean, is that if they had gotten into the champions league this year, with the amount of money they made, their next few signings may have been a player from the EPL instead of an SPL player.
-
28-08-2015 09:51 PM #39This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The solution is obvious - Septic and Sevco Huns aren't wanted in England so they have no-one else to play except the other Scottish clubs. And the sooner the other Scottish clubs realise that and join together to stand up to the Ugly Sisters the better.Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.
-
-
28-08-2015 11:05 PM #41This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
People say a lot of negative things about American sports but they have got one thing right: they know that without competitiveness, the product will die. Teams over there are part of a collective first and individual entities second. Over here, we are all totally separate entities who share practically no common interest apart from the country we play in. It's total dog-eat-dog and nobody seems to care about the golden goose dying as long as they are ok in the short term.
We need something brought in like the revenue sharing formula they have in baseball. There will be two big losers and everyone else will be a winner. Without this I reckon the game up here will slowly die due to lack of interest starting at the lower levels as people will just find something else to do in this digital age.
-
28-08-2015 11:21 PM #42
Everything about the money in the game and European competition (and I use the term loosely) is horribly wrong. A team like Hibs were a respected team in Europe although the chances of us winning anything were pretty remote. We couldn't qualify for the top competition and therefore played against similar also rans from differing countries. The playing field was pretty level, as opposed to nowadays when top teams in their own countries are "dropped" into the Europa league where they might ensure that no "minnow" club will ever again dine at the top table. Irrespective of the commonly held viewpoint, without the smaller clubs the game is well and truly ducked.
There will always be bigger teams with more spending power, but we have moved into a world of extremes nowadays with the usual suspects in every champions league being almost guaranteed to make it through to the final rounds. On a much smaller scale we look around at our own game and are too quick to write it off as inferior, whereas the figures tell us that our game is better supported per head of capita than the EPL. If only we had the right people at the top to use data like this to promote our game. Sadly the dithering clowns collectively known as the GFA have no interest apart from being subservient to the bigot brothers. I would love a league that didn't involve the OF as the competition would be intense with probably five or six clubs in with a chance of winning the league. Sadly it wont happen unless we take a leaf out of American football, where generally it is run with the view of everyone should have a sporting chance. This, of course, would require a major shake up of our game with people at the top who loved the game and wanted to see it flourish. Meanwhile, in the European backwater of football known as Scotland, the game is run by a bunch of morons who still look over the border, drooling, salivating, green faced with envy and their heads stuck up their own κωλος.
-
29-08-2015 07:11 AM #43This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-08-2015 07:25 AM #44
Start with banning live scottish league matches unless we get significantly more money for it.
-
29-08-2015 09:38 AM #45This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
29-08-2015 10:18 AM #47This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
In Scotland we have 12 teams in the top league and 42 teams overall. But they aren't just competing with each other, they're competing for players with teams in England (common language and similar culture) and even throughout Europe. There are some measures that can be introduced (eg compensation for the home team in a TV game, fairer split of prize money) but others (eg a salary cap) are impractical because of the outside competition.Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.
-
30-08-2015 09:28 AM #48
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 8,314
Jim Spence weighs into the discussion
http://www.thecourier.co.uk/sport/fo...inner-1.897287
Originally Posted by SpencyThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-08-2015 09:41 AM #49This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I've long been irritated by talk of being "best of the rest" and "splitting the Old Firm".
Whilst the OF have a massive financial advantage and you would expect them to dominate I don't think it's that unreasonable to expect someone else to maybe grow a team from youth players and give them a push at least once in thirty years.
We were probably as close to growing a team to challenge them as anyone with our "Golden Generation" but as a club we were more interested at that time in being a real estate project than a football club so it came to nothing. I'd put that down to a lack of ambition.
Hearts have occasionally shown ambition but unfortunately it was wrapped up in delusion, fantasy and atrocious financial planning that but for a stroke of luck might have cost them their very club's existence.
Too many of the rest (see comments from twats like the Killie chairman) are just parasites who are only interested in hanging off the coat tails of the Old Firm.
It would be brilliant to see Aberdeen push them and pip them this year. If they don't then it'll just revert back to a media frenzy about when/ how The Rangers are going to get back challenging them. And let's be honest, that utterly tedious 2 horse race bigotfest bunfight isn't any more appealing than the status quo and any new fans that Aberdeen, Dundee United, Hearts, Dundee etc might have made will probably drift away again.
-
30-08-2015 09:45 AM #50
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 8,314
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-08-2015 10:27 AM #51This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I'm not saying this "growing a team" stuff should happen all the time - but I don't think once every 20 years or so is too much to ask. The lack of ambition and acceptance of the status quo in Scotland just gets on my nerves. Alex Ferguson at no point accepted the domination of the Old Firm as being an inevitability - there haven't been enough idealists prepared to challenge the idea of domination of the big two.
-
30-08-2015 01:36 PM #52
As I recall Hibs were one of the clubs who backed home clubs keeping all the gate money back in the day, as things stand I cant see that stance changing when you look at some of the attendances in the Premiership at the moment compared to what we get even now. There is no chance of getting Celtic to agree to this either, they are all consumed by the Champions league and will do nothing to threaten their position at the top domestically and I highly doubt Hearts or Aberdeen would go for it for the same reasons as us.
IMO the only way to improve the finances for us and the rest is a bigger sellable Premiership packed with local derby matches and games like Aberdeen v Dundee Utd, Hibs v The Rangers, Hearts v Celtic and for there to be a much fairer distribution of the TV money, with every club getting an equal share .... that is the one concession the SFA / SPFL should be forcing the OF to accept for the good of everybody.
The thing the SPFL and their predecessors never seemed to have thought of is the distribution of fixtures. What is the point of for example playing all derby matches on the same weekend forcing the TV companies to chose one over the other .... these are our most sellable games.
Hibs v Hearts
Celtlc v The Rangers
Dundee v Dundee Utd
ICT v Ross County
Motherwell v Hamilton
Aberdeen v Celtic / The Rangers
Hibs v Celtic / The Rangers
Hearts v Celtic / The Rangers
Dundee Utd v Celtic The Rangers
None of these matches should be scheduled for the same weekend, meaning the TV folk will always have a big match to show.
There are other tasty fixtures like Dundee Utd v Aberdeen, Dundee v St Johnstone, Hibs and Hearts v Aberdeen and Dundee Utd that make good fillers.Last edited by NAE NOOKIE; 30-08-2015 at 02:03 PM.
-
30-08-2015 06:03 PM #53This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think the Old Firm would most benefit by creating their own league, and play each every other week. They could hardly blame each other for their subsequent European failures.
-
30-08-2015 06:34 PM #54This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-08-2015 06:50 PM #55
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 77
- Posts
- 2,340
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
By the way, I don't agree with anything he says - just his right to say it.Last edited by CockneyRebel; 30-08-2015 at 06:53 PM.
-
30-08-2015 06:54 PM #56This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
30-08-2015 06:57 PM #58This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-08-2015 06:59 PM #59This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-08-2015 07:01 PM #60
Guys calm it down eh?
We don't need people calling each other zoomers, trolls or whatever else.
We're all adults so lets act like it and debate our points sensibly. Cheers.PM Awards General Poster of The Year 2015, 2016, 2017. Probably robbed in other years
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks