As Rotherham's first bid for Scott Allan is reportedly £100,000 more than The Rangers third bid, who do we think are the bigger Club?
Vote Now
View Poll Results: Who's the Bigger Club?
- Voters
- 95. You may not vote on this poll
-
Rotherham
86 90.53% -
That wee Sleakit Nest of Vipers calling itself Rangers
9 9.47%
Results 1 to 19 of 19
-
05-08-2015 01:34 PM #1
Who's the Bigger Club, Rotherham or The Rangers
Last edited by Keith_M; 05-08-2015 at 01:53 PM.
-
05-08-2015 01:44 PM #2
It's obviously Rotherham as they've bid the larger amount. I heard it was cash up front as well. Tbh I'd be pretty embarrassed if I was a Rangers fan.
United we stand here....
-
-
05-08-2015 01:58 PM #4
Sevco
Rotherham play at a higher level and have far more money.
SEVCO 2012 have a larger stadium, better academy and larger fan base.
Rotherham will pay him more.
-
05-08-2015 01:59 PM #5Elephant StoneLeft by mutual consent!
Sevco have the potential to be the bigger club and may one day be able to afford our players. They may even be able to outbid Rotherham. At the moment, though, with 90 years of unblemished history and seemingly greater spending power, Rotherham must be seen to be the bigger club.
-
-
-
05-08-2015 03:03 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I thought it said bigoted clubLast edited by Billy McKirdy; 05-08-2015 at 03:09 PM.
-
05-08-2015 03:07 PM #9
I've never liked Rotherham since I trekked down there for a Hammers game when Roeder caused a fuss about the changing rooms and West Ham managed to lose. IIRC Defoe got sent off too.
Last edited by HUTCHYHIBBY; 05-08-2015 at 03:12 PM.
-
05-08-2015 03:34 PM #10
If the verbal agreement really was to let SA go if a big club came in for him then I'd say Rotherham fit the bill nicely - they play in England ffs.
-
05-08-2015 04:06 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
05-08-2015 04:22 PM #12
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 1,479
Did we not get Gareth Evans from Rotherham?
-
05-08-2015 04:23 PM #13
More money, more cups (one, apparently), more history (well over four years of it).
No contest.
GG
-
05-08-2015 04:58 PM #14
One has a history stretching back 90 years in the lower levels of the game in their country, have won 3 lower leagues, have reached the final of one of the major trophies in their country and won a trophy exclusively for lower league sides.
The other has been remarkably successful in a short space of time. Founded in 2012 they have won 2 lower league titles, been beaten in the final of the Petrofac Cup by a team with a far richer history and been beaten play off finalist, being denied an almost remarkable rise to the Premiership for the 1st time in their history in only 3 seasons.
It's a tough call but on heritage alone it has to be Rotherham.
-
-
-
05-08-2015 05:24 PM #17
Rotherham just now but Sevco certainly have the potential for bigger things in the future.
Give them time FFS, they're only three years old!
-
-
05-08-2015 06:46 PM #19
Its Rotherham obviously as they have had time to build a history, traditions etc, but to be fair the answer would be totally different if the question was which club has stolen the most money/bumped the most creditors/ owner has the most tax convictions etc...............................
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks