Have to be, it was the same players that played today [ok if you want to be pedantic with the exception of Scott Martin]This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Results 571 to 588 of 588
-
25-07-2015 05:53 PM #571
-
25-07-2015 05:58 PM #572This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Aye because we often started with Stanton and Martin in the midfield, and Allan up front for over an hour. And Scott allan was normally a sub we sent on when we were playing catchup against Sevco??
-
25-07-2015 06:09 PM #573
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 14,570
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hibs were the better side first half. And 6-2 flattered. We'll be ready for them next time.
-
25-07-2015 06:14 PM #574This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-07-2015 06:14 PM #575
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 6,675
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-07-2015 06:20 PM #576
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 27,490
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-07-2015 06:47 PM #577
Just reading on twitter Forster could be out for 3 weeks with hamstring injury.
I don't think I've seen an injury list like this
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
-
25-07-2015 06:47 PM #578
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 6,018
I've just re-watched most of the match, that performance today was right up there with some of the shockers under Butcher, Calderwood and the likes.
We must win against Dumbarton in the league.
-
25-07-2015 07:35 PM #579This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-07-2015 07:38 PM #580This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-07-2015 07:53 PM #581This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Where has the money come from to pay for the (three year I think) contracts of a new management team, and the several players they have already signed, plus making a bid (albeit derisory) for Scott Allan. A sum Hibs amongst many other clubs can only dream about offering for a player's signature.
I cannot believe someone like Warburton, with his financial background in the City of London, would agree to take up his post knowing he possibly might not get paid! Would their new signings, and their agents, agree to sign for The Rangers if they were "skint".
I would be very surprised if they had the financial clout of Celtic, but that applies to every other team in Scotland.
-
25-07-2015 07:56 PM #582
I didn't actually think Sevco were that great. We just collapsed.
Same problem as last year though. Didn't take our chances when we were on top.
-
25-07-2015 08:00 PM #583This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-07-2015 08:01 PM #584This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Of course they have more financial clout than us. That will always be the case , but they are shopping in a market not too far from us IMO which is lower Championship / league 1 and 2.
They never had (or have) any intention of buying Scott Allan as they would know we won't sell for anything less that around 500k and they don't have that kind of money. Their aim was to disrupt their closest rivals best player and it appear to have worked.
-
25-07-2015 08:06 PM #585This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
25-07-2015 08:09 PM #586This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I don't know if they've got money or not, given the paltry terms they offered for Allan though, it hardly smacks of them being flush...
At a guess, I'd say they have more money than us though, even if they only used season ticket money with no other investment that would be the case.Follow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
25-07-2015 08:10 PM #587This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
We will find out in the next week if they have the money or not. If they really want SA, and it would certainly be hugely popular with their fans, they will cough up a higher price and no doubt leak it out again. My guess is this won't happen.
Add to the fact Allan would be looking for a good wedge and they would want him on a lengthy contract you are probably looking at £2 million plus for the deal. We shall see.
-
25-07-2015 08:23 PM #588This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
FWIW, their wage bill is probably not all that different to what it was last season I suspect, but I don't know that for a fact. I'm not party to that sort of information. I don't know what the terms of their new players contracts are for example. That's usually private & confidential. I'm not sure if they have settled with McCoist either. I heard they had been paying him ridiculous money. So again I ask what do you mean by "skint"?
I'm not so sure they would make an offer for Allan, then increase that offer once it was rejected, purely with the intention of disrupting their closest rivals best player. I think they genuinely wanted to sign Allan, and still do. The fact that it may have caused problems for Hibs is of course an added bonus for them.
I'm not defending them BTW. Disgusting, arrogant sectarian club and supporters.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks