hibs.net Messageboard

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 168
  1. #31
    Not going to happen for next season but every chance for 2016/17 to ensure Huns and us go up. Agree the Huns will strengthen massively in the summer and might stroll the league, but the SFA/SPFL will not want to risk a repeat of the Yam situation with Hibs winning the league and Huns getting dumped in the POs.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #32
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    46
    Posts
    26,871
    Quote Originally Posted by hibees 7062 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Easily changed to suit mate . The Rangers will be promoted no matter what is what i heard
    Where from? Bloke in the pub? Conspiracy theorist on the internet?

  4. #33
    @hibs.net private member Jim44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    76
    Posts
    22,157
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Trig View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think the tie's done, personally.

    I can't see a Premiership side losing a two goal lead, going into the home leg against a Championship team.
    Cheeky. Keep us out of it.

  5. #34
    @hibs.net private member scoopyboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Scoopsville
    Age
    64
    Posts
    12,002
    Quote Originally Posted by Trig View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think the tie's done, personally.

    I can't see a Premiership side losing a two goal lead, going into the home leg against a Championship team.
    Bet you thought somebody would have picked you up on this long before now!!!

  6. #35
    @hibs.net private member Godsahibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    My Bit
    Age
    42
    Posts
    2,411
    Can't see reconstruction happening, certainly not for the start of next season

  7. #36
    Coaching Staff Ronniekirk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Paisley
    Posts
    11,959
    Quote Originally Posted by Trig View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think the tie's done, personally.

    I can't see a Premiership side losing a two goal lead, going into the home leg against a Championship team.
    I only watched the last 15 minutes or so and Rangers had the better chances during that period and Motherwell players looked tired So if Rangers can get the first goal you never know ,but it's hard to see Motherwell not scoring against them at home if they managed three away from home .

  8. #37
    Testimonial Due Lee Marvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,131
    Surely giving 1 years notice for league reconstruction makes that year almost meaningless for a large majority of teams? I.e no relegation or promotion to play for, therefore what is the point?

    If hibs know it's going to happen year after next, why bother with the season? Play young team and save money for the next again season

  9. #38
    @hibs.net private member StevieC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    8,619
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronniekirk View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I only watched the last 15 minutes or so and Rangers had the better chances during that period and Motherwell players looked tired
    I only saw the highlights, but the Motherwell tactics seemed to be to hit them on the break. A few times I saw the full backs sprinting up the wings whenever 'Well broke, so it's little wonder they tired. I doubt they will adopt the same tactics going into the home game with a 3-1 lead and might be able to pace themselves.
    But you know it ain't all about wealth,
    as long as you make a note to .. EXPRESS YOURSELF!

  10. #39
    Coaching Staff emerald green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Capital City
    Posts
    6,077
    I've done a wee bit of background reading on this subject.

    The last time there was league reconstruction was agreed was in June 2013 when the Scottish Football League (SFL) clubs voted in favour, paving the way for the creation of the new Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL).

    That decision to approve reconstruction plans followed the unanimous decision of the Scottish Premier League (SPL) clubs to give the proposals the go ahead, meaning the 2 league bodies merged to form the SPFL that summer. Whether that would be the case again, who knows, but see below.

    At a meeting at Hampden, 23 SFL clubs voted to approve the change, with 6 voting against. 22 of the 29 clubs entitled to vote were required to vote in favour for the plans to be given the go ahead. That vote came just weeks after an indicative vote from SFL clubs failed to get 22 votes, prompting the threat of a breakaway by First Division clubs, who said they would apply to join the SPL. Talks subsequently persuaded a change of heart by some clubs. I wonder what it was that persuaded that change of heart? I can guess.

    It was this reconstruction that introduced play-offs, and a new financial distribution plan that benefited then current first division clubs in particular.


    I don't know how long the above decisions and plans had been in the making. Had the clubs been discussing this for months / years prior to this decision?

    It seems to me (but I might be wrong) it's by no means certain that further league reconstruction would necessarily be agreed again, especially since the current set up has been in place for such a relatively short period of time. I suspect certain clubs will vote against any reconstruction in order to protect their own financial interests.

    How feasible and / or practical it is for any league reconstruction taking place in time for next season is another matter. I don't think it would be feasible or practical, given the time constraints, and especially with clubs trying to plan and prepare for next season.

    What would be sponsors views on any league reconstruction be and so on?

  11. #40
    @hibs.net private member Thief's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bonnyrigg
    Age
    59
    Posts
    284
    Quote Originally Posted by emerald green View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What would be sponsors views on any league reconstruction be and so on?
    Well researched and tend to agree with everything you've said, however, that last sentence would, in my opinion, be what determines whether it happens or not. Ladbrokes/sky/BT sports can have a hell of an influence and
    as someone mentioned earlier, a fairer share of sponsors and TV revenue could easily secure the required votes.

  12. #41
    Coaching Staff Houchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    I'm here, i'm there...
    Age
    46
    Posts
    5,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Trig View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think the tie's done, personally.

    I can't see a Premiership side losing a two goal lead, going into the home leg against a Championship team.
    Apart from Hibs you mean? Remember last season when we were 2-0 up at New Douglas Park then lost on penalties.

  13. #42
    Coaching Staff emerald green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Capital City
    Posts
    6,077
    Quote Originally Posted by Thief View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Well researched and tend to agree with everything you've said, however, that last sentence would, in my opinion, be what determines whether it happens or not. Ladbrokes/sky/BT sports can have a hell of an influence and
    as someone mentioned earlier, a fairer share of sponsors and TV revenue could easily secure the required votes.
    Cheers. You could well be right in what you say.

    I would welcome league reconstruction for the start of next season (if it was to the benefit of Hibs) but whether that's going to be possible or not we'll know in the next few weeks maybe?
    Last edited by emerald green; 29-05-2015 at 10:35 AM. Reason: Typo

  14. #43
    Coaching Staff Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    35,520
    When the SPFL was formed it was agreed that if there was to be further reorganisation within 3 years then it would need the unanimous approval of all 42 clubs.
    It's not going to happen.

  15. #44
    First Team Regular hibsmad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Dalkeith
    Age
    43
    Posts
    813
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    When the SPFL was formed it was agreed that if there was to be further reorganisation within 3 years then it would need the unanimous approval of all 42 clubs.
    It's not going to happen.
    If it was to happen in 2016, which I believe is what most people are discussing, then that would be 3 years would it not?

  16. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by Houchy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Apart from Hibs you mean? Remember last season when we were 2-0 up at New Douglas Park then lost on penalties.
    I think Trigs tongue was firmly in his cheek when he posted that!

  17. #46
    Coaching Staff Waxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Age
    54
    Posts
    7,447
    I'd keep what we have now. Not ideal but alternatives are all worse.unless we go back to bigger leagues playing each other twice.

  18. #47
    @hibs.net private member Arch Stanton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Age
    75
    Posts
    3,937
    Quote Originally Posted by StevieC View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I only saw the highlights, but the Motherwell tactics seemed to be to hit them on the break. A few times I saw the full backs sprinting up the wings whenever 'Well broke, so it's little wonder they tired. I doubt they will adopt the same tactics going into the home game with a 3-1 lead and might be able to pace themselves.
    The two young subs he brought on did really well and were the reason they finished so strongly - I can see them both starting on Sun.

    However, this is their 5th important game in two weeks so I think it will be hard for them to match Motherwell.

  19. #48
    @hibs.net private member Thief's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bonnyrigg
    Age
    59
    Posts
    284
    Quote Originally Posted by emerald green View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Cheers. You could be well be right in what you say.

    I would welcome league reconstruction for the start of next season (if it was to the benefit of Hibs) but whether that's going to be possible or not we'll know in the next few weeks maybe?
    I personally don't think it will happen for next season.
    Only point I was making is that money talks, and if it does happen, it would be initiated by ladbrokes, BT sports and sky.
    We've probably all heard the (unsubstantiated) rumour of the clause in the ladbrokes sponsorship about minimum number of old firm derby's. :-)

  20. #49
    @hibs.net private member jacomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    exile
    Posts
    22,101
    Quote Originally Posted by Waxy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd keep what we have now. Not ideal but alternatives are all worse.unless we go back to bigger leagues playing each other twice.
    I think bigger leagues very much on the agenda.

  21. #50
    Don't be too sure of Sevco failing!! With Craig Thomson reffing the 2nd leg, there is still hope for The New Bigots.

  22. #51
    Coaching Staff emerald green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Capital City
    Posts
    6,077
    Quote Originally Posted by Thief View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I personally don't think it will happen for next season.
    Only point I was making is that money talks, and if it does happen, it would be initiated by ladbrokes, BT sports and sky.
    We've probably all heard the (unsubstantiated) rumour of the clause in the ladbrokes sponsorship about minimum number of old firm derby's. :-)
    Me neither.

    I agree again - money talks.

  23. #52
    Ask Ladbrokes to quote a price for league reconstruction in place for next season today and ask again after the next leg if Rangers don't get through - there will be the answer

  24. #53
    @hibs.net private member hibees 7062's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,500
    Quote Originally Posted by Danderhall Hibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Where from? Bloke in the pub? Conspiracy theorist on the internet?
    Staff member at Hamilton

  25. #54
    It would be interesting to see how many of the people crying out for league reconstruction, to have more teams in the top flight, are the same people who are desperate to get out of this league as they are 'sick of going to sh*te holes' in the championship to play crap teams.

  26. #55
    First Team Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    sydney
    Age
    52
    Posts
    544
    16 team league with a top 6 finals series like the A-league.
    celtic still favourites but not guaranteed.

    Spfl is utterly boring as it is and dying on its erchie

  27. #56
    @hibs.net private member Bristolhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Chippenham/Bath
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,586
    For all we know there are two prices in the Sponsorship Contract. One with Rangers in the top flight, and one without.

    For League Reconstruction to happen for next season, talks would have to be advanced, and the lower league clubs would have to know how much of that (extra) sugar would be heading their way.

    Premier clubs would also have to recognise that it would mean less Celtic home games, but that would be balanced out by having more Rangers, Hibs and Hearts games.

    It can be done, will it be done, not sure.

    I'm sure that what ever basket case financial management plan The The Rangers have will be predicated in going up this season. That will hurt them.

    J

  28. #57
    Coaching Staff Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    35,520
    Quote Originally Posted by jockodile View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    16 team league with a top 6 finals series like the A-league.
    celtic still favourites but not guaranteed.

    Spfl is utterly boring as it is and dying on its erchie
    That would be a great set up but I can't see people in Scotland going for it. Too different from what they are used to.

  29. #58
    @hibs.net private member CraigHibee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    44
    Posts
    3,818
    Quote Originally Posted by Trig View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think the tie's done, personally.

    I can't see a Premiership side losing a two goal lead, going into the home leg against a Championship team.
    could never possibly happen... could it?

  30. #59
    Coaching Staff Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North stand
    Posts
    17,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Bristolhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    For all we know there are two prices in the Sponsorship Contract. One with Rangers in the top flight, and one without.

    For League Reconstruction to happen for next season, talks would have to be advanced, and the lower league clubs would have to know how much of that (extra) sugar would be heading their way.

    Premier clubs would also have to recognise that it would mean less Celtic home games, but that would be balanced out by having more Rangers, Hibs and Hearts games.

    It can be done, will it be done, not sure.

    I'm sure that what ever basket case financial management plan The The Rangers have will be predicated in going up this season. That will hurt them.

    J
    I would be very surprised if this wasn't the case. To the money men, the old firm game IS Scottish football and it's in their interests for it to happen sooner rather than later.

    If Motherwell stay up it's pretty much guaranteed that "change" will happen for 16/17 if not sooner. It might end up being a procession as it's announced that four teams will be promoted this year with no relegation from the top flight.

    Ladbrokes aren't some white knight and there's one reason they are putting money in which is the guarantee that they will eventually get something back...a bigotfest.

  31. #60
    Testimonial Due Vini1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Glasgow
    Age
    60
    Posts
    2,105
    For the fans a 16 team league playing each team twice would be ideal. It would give everyone more of a chance against the OF and would give less of a congested programme over the season, plus it would cost less. Away trips might be more attractive since you only have to visit once. However the clubs especially the smaller clubs won't agree to only one visit from the OF and less home games. Also TV want 4 OF games.

    I think it is short sighted, as the league would be more attractive and in turn would bring in more fans. The OF might not like if there is a chance other teams might challenge for the league.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)