Not going to happen for next season but every chance for 2016/17 to ensure Huns and us go up. Agree the Huns will strengthen massively in the summer and might stroll the league, but the SFA/SPFL will not want to risk a repeat of the Yam situation with Hibs winning the league and Huns getting dumped in the POs.
Results 31 to 60 of 168
-
29-05-2015 06:45 AM #31
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 10,658
-
29-05-2015 06:52 AM #32
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 26,871
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 06:54 AM #33This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 06:54 AM #34This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 06:58 AM #35
Can't see reconstruction happening, certainly not for the start of next season
-
29-05-2015 07:33 AM #36This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 07:36 AM #37
Surely giving 1 years notice for league reconstruction makes that year almost meaningless for a large majority of teams? I.e no relegation or promotion to play for, therefore what is the point?
If hibs know it's going to happen year after next, why bother with the season? Play young team and save money for the next again season
-
29-05-2015 07:51 AM #38This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 08:35 AM #39
I've done a wee bit of background reading on this subject.
The last time there was league reconstruction was agreed was in June 2013 when the Scottish Football League (SFL) clubs voted in favour, paving the way for the creation of the new Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL).
That decision to approve reconstruction plans followed the unanimous decision of the Scottish Premier League (SPL) clubs to give the proposals the go ahead, meaning the 2 league bodies merged to form the SPFL that summer. Whether that would be the case again, who knows, but see below.
At a meeting at Hampden, 23 SFL clubs voted to approve the change, with 6 voting against. 22 of the 29 clubs entitled to vote were required to vote in favour for the plans to be given the go ahead. That vote came just weeks after an indicative vote from SFL clubs failed to get 22 votes, prompting the threat of a breakaway by First Division clubs, who said they would apply to join the SPL. Talks subsequently persuaded a change of heart by some clubs. I wonder what it was that persuaded that change of heart? I can guess.
It was this reconstruction that introduced play-offs, and a new financial distribution plan that benefited then current first division clubs in particular.
I don't know how long the above decisions and plans had been in the making. Had the clubs been discussing this for months / years prior to this decision?
It seems to me (but I might be wrong) it's by no means certain that further league reconstruction would necessarily be agreed again, especially since the current set up has been in place for such a relatively short period of time. I suspect certain clubs will vote against any reconstruction in order to protect their own financial interests.
How feasible and / or practical it is for any league reconstruction taking place in time for next season is another matter. I don't think it would be feasible or practical, given the time constraints, and especially with clubs trying to plan and prepare for next season.
What would be sponsors views on any league reconstruction be and so on?
-
29-05-2015 08:56 AM #40This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
as someone mentioned earlier, a fairer share of sponsors and TV revenue could easily secure the required votes.
-
29-05-2015 08:58 AM #41This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 09:04 AM #42This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I would welcome league reconstruction for the start of next season (if it was to the benefit of Hibs) but whether that's going to be possible or not we'll know in the next few weeks maybe?Last edited by emerald green; 29-05-2015 at 10:35 AM. Reason: Typo
-
29-05-2015 09:11 AM #43
When the SPFL was formed it was agreed that if there was to be further reorganisation within 3 years then it would need the unanimous approval of all 42 clubs.
It's not going to happen.
-
29-05-2015 09:57 AM #44This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 10:05 AM #45This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 10:11 AM #46
I'd keep what we have now. Not ideal but alternatives are all worse.unless we go back to bigger leagues playing each other twice.
-
29-05-2015 10:14 AM #47This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
However, this is their 5th important game in two weeks so I think it will be hard for them to match Motherwell.
-
29-05-2015 10:21 AM #48This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Only point I was making is that money talks, and if it does happen, it would be initiated by ladbrokes, BT sports and sky.
We've probably all heard the (unsubstantiated) rumour of the clause in the ladbrokes sponsorship about minimum number of old firm derby's. :-)
-
29-05-2015 10:26 AM #49This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 10:27 AM #50
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Posts
- 695
Don't be too sure of Sevco failing!! With Craig Thomson reffing the 2nd leg, there is still hope for The New Bigots.
-
29-05-2015 10:37 AM #51This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I agree again - money talks.
-
29-05-2015 10:48 AM #52
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 2,397
Ask Ladbrokes to quote a price for league reconstruction in place for next season today and ask again after the next leg if Rangers don't get through - there will be the answer
-
29-05-2015 11:18 AM #53This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 11:28 AM #54
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 7,792
It would be interesting to see how many of the people crying out for league reconstruction, to have more teams in the top flight, are the same people who are desperate to get out of this league as they are 'sick of going to sh*te holes' in the championship to play crap teams.
-
29-05-2015 11:29 AM #55
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- sydney
- Age
- 52
- Posts
- 544
16 team league with a top 6 finals series like the A-league.
celtic still favourites but not guaranteed.
Spfl is utterly boring as it is and dying on its erchie
-
29-05-2015 11:32 AM #56
For all we know there are two prices in the Sponsorship Contract. One with Rangers in the top flight, and one without.
For League Reconstruction to happen for next season, talks would have to be advanced, and the lower league clubs would have to know how much of that (extra) sugar would be heading their way.
Premier clubs would also have to recognise that it would mean less Celtic home games, but that would be balanced out by having more Rangers, Hibs and Hearts games.
It can be done, will it be done, not sure.
I'm sure that what ever basket case financial management plan The The Rangers have will be predicated in going up this season. That will hurt them.
J
-
29-05-2015 11:46 AM #57This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 12:05 PM #58This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-05-2015 12:28 PM #59This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If Motherwell stay up it's pretty much guaranteed that "change" will happen for 16/17 if not sooner. It might end up being a procession as it's announced that four teams will be promoted this year with no relegation from the top flight.
Ladbrokes aren't some white knight and there's one reason they are putting money in which is the guarantee that they will eventually get something back...a bigotfest.
-
29-05-2015 12:38 PM #60
For the fans a 16 team league playing each team twice would be ideal. It would give everyone more of a chance against the OF and would give less of a congested programme over the season, plus it would cost less. Away trips might be more attractive since you only have to visit once. However the clubs especially the smaller clubs won't agree to only one visit from the OF and less home games. Also TV want 4 OF games.
I think it is short sighted, as the league would be more attractive and in turn would bring in more fans. The OF might not like if there is a chance other teams might challenge for the league.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks