Fyvie or Robertson?

[KeithTheHibby]

Do we need both of these guys playing? They are very similar type of player.

With Allan a shoe in to return on Saturday who drops out? It will probably be Boyle however with that goes any kind of width our midfield has.

It's a tough one for Stubbs however I think the midfield suffers when both of these guys play as we lack width.

[Danderhall Hibs]

Fyvie can't be dropped. He's been excellent recently.

[Stokesy's on fire]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Do we need both of these guys playing? They are very similar type of player.

With Allan a shoe in to return on Saturday who drops out? It will probably be Boyle however with that goes any kind of width our midfield has.

It's a tough one for Stubbs however I think the midfield suffers when both of these guys play as we lack width.

Yes we need them both a strong depth in our squad will do nicely

[Smartie]

Some of Robertson's distribution was very poor last night (same for a few of our players).

He'd drop out for me.

Although Stubbs may go for the diamond again and drop a centre-half.

[cabbage_88]

Definitely need both IMO. Fyvie has been superb since he's signed and Robertson has been one of our most consistent players all season. Wouldn't know who to drop of we are still going to be playing the 3-5-2. Decent headache for the manager to have

[lucky]

I think it will be McGeough that will drops out

[Stewboy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I think it will be McGeough that will drops out

Really?????

[Wotherspiniesta]

Wouldn''t drop Boyle anyway, he's been excellent at RWB.

[Jones28]

I'd drop a defender and go 3-5-2

[Big_Franck]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I think it will be McGeough that will drops out

No chance IMO. I think we'll go back to 442 with the midfield diamond of robertson, fyvie, mcgeouch and allan.

Anyone know how long watson and gray are from returning? Would be great to have more options for falkirk.

[Scooter]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'd drop a defender and go 3-5-2

Eh???
That's what he's been playing

[Franck Stanton]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Wouldn''t drop Boyle anyway, he's been excellent at RWB.

Excellent ? Really ? Suppose it is all about opinions, but to me he just isn't good enough. Especially last night, thought he was very poor.

[Matty_Jack04]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

No chance IMO. I think we'll go back to 442 with the midfield diamond of robertson, fyvie, mcgeouch and allan.

Anyone know how long watson and gray are from returning? Would be great to have more options for falkirk.

To go back to 442 I'd rather Forster was RB than Boyle, I think boyles been good at RWB but playing a flat back 4 we'd need a proper defender there

[lucky]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Really?????

If Hibs play 3-5-2 I can't see how Dylan gets in the team. Boyle is more suited to the RWB role. But if we go 4-4-2 then Foster to RB and Boyle drops out. Questions over who starts up front as Malonga must come into the reckoning.

[Wotherspiniesta]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Excellent ? Really ? Suppose it is all about opinions, but to me he just isn't good enough. Especially last night, thought he was very poor.

Yes, excellent. I was a bit worried to see him pitched in to that position against Hearts, bu thought his energy levels were brilliant. I thought we missed him in the semi aswell.

Last night I thought he played well too, maybe I'm just not a grumpy auld git though

[ancient hibee]

I think Boyle is hopeless.What is the point in having a lot of pace if you do absolutely zero with the ball.

[bingo70]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I think Boyle is hopeless.What is the point in having a lot of pace if you do absolutely zero with the ball.

I think there's a place for him as a winger, forwards with pace always cause problems. As a wing back though, I can't see it, he inevitably gets the ball too deep and he's not got the ability or technique to deliver crosses from deep so he's a waste of a Jersey in that position imo.

[B.H.F.C]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Yes, excellent. I was a bit worried to see him pitched in to that position against Hearts, bu thought his energy levels were brilliant. I thought we missed him in the semi aswell.

Last night I thought he played well too, maybe I'm just not a grumpy auld git though

Hearts was the one good game he played in the position, IMO. Poor at Dumbarton. Never picked anyone out at all last night despite being in numerous good positions.

[Bishop Hibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If Hibs play 3-5-2 I can't see how Dylan gets in the team. Boyle is more suited to the RWB role. But if we go 4-4-2 then Foster to RB and Boyle drops out. Questions over who starts up front as Malonga must come into the reckoning.

For me it's Allan, McGeoch and A.N. Other for the centre positions on a 3-5-2. I'd play the same team as Wednesday except Allan in for Fyvie. The sooner Gray and Watson are back the better.

[Winston Ingram]

Both. Robertson has been excellent this season

[keep the faith]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

For me it's Allan, McGeoch and A.N. Other for the centre positions on a 3-5-2. I'd play the same team as Wednesday except Allan in for Fyvie. The sooner Gray and Watson are back the better.

You would drop Fyvie???

Him and Allan are are our lynchpins IMO.

[NadeAteMyLunch!]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You would drop Fyvie???

Him and Allan are are our lynchpins IMO.

Fyvie was motm last night. Agreed, should not be dropped