Bit more drastic than I had in mind, but interesting idea to give each club an identical sumThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I don't have the figures to hand, but there is a massive drop from first to second, and another large drop to third before the change in prize money between places becomes reasonably consistent. Decreasing the size of the gap between first/second and second/third woud be very achievable.
Results 31 to 44 of 44
Thread: Ditch The TV Deal?
-
08-03-2015 02:53 PM #31Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.
-
08-03-2015 03:08 PM #32This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2015 03:23 PM #33This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2015 03:43 PM #34This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
08-03-2015 03:49 PM #35This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
08-03-2015 04:10 PM #36This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2015 04:13 PM #37This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2015 06:27 PM #38
If games were back to sat 3pm I would be able to attend more games by being able to book flights earlier in advance. I also think it has impacted on crowds at ER. Folk stopped buying st, s due to ko times, some of thesefolk then missed a couple of games due to not having a st. So I think it has definitely impacted on crowds
-
08-03-2015 06:35 PM #39This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2015 07:42 PM #40This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
08-03-2015 08:03 PM #41
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Location
- South Shields
- Posts
- 210
I've got to say Sat at 3pm would always be my preferred option but then I'm old skool
TV games may bring extra revenue to clubs but the real fans who attend games can often have to resort to watching on TV if no transport is available after FT. Friday night & Saturday 5.30pm games spring to mind here.
Most of the time Sky or BT just want to show Celtic so left to BBC to show other league meetings lower down and cup ties.
-
08-03-2015 08:43 PM #42This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-03-2015 07:44 AM #43This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-03-2015 10:40 AM #44
Let's take Lawwell first - Celtic only have 5 home games shown live on TV in the League (it was 4 when Rangers were in the League and two were Old Firm games), every other club has at least 6 but if you are in the bottom six, it could be 7.
Also, when Celtic were in the Europa League and had games moved to Sunday's, they requested to play them at 1pm even when they were not on TV!
Also, did Lawwell not accompany Doncaster down to London to talk to Sky and ESPN in 2012 to keep the deal?
Moving on, I remember people on here in 2012 saying Sky and ESPN better not walk away just because Rangers were not in the then SPL. They stayed, even though they were not contractually obliged, and they still get pelters.
In the past, especially in the first two years of the Setanta deal between 2004-2006, they only had 38 games a season (one a week) and they only broadcast one live Edinburgh Derby in each of the first two seasons meaning a lot of fans could not watch the game.
TV brings advertising and sponsorship.
Don't just blame TV, ask the real questions.
Why do the SFA have a superb TV deal (which gets missed) with UEFA, Sky and BBC, worth a lot of money and the SPFL don't with Sky, BT and BBC Alba?
Why do the SFA have good sponsorship deals with Vauxhall, William Hill and Adidas but the SPFL doesn't have a sponsor?
Why did the SPFL knock back £100 million + from Sky to go with Setanta in 2008 and within a year had to go to Sky/ESPN and accept what they were offered?
Why does the SPFL dilute the rights for the two companies that put more money into Scottish football than anyone else (Sky and BT) by giving BBC Alba rights for next to nothing, nearly every website highlights rights to the detriment of the clubs own websites?
What we should be looking at is working with TV to get a better deal. Not a fairer deal just because England get plenty money, the SPFL have to earn it.
Should 78 league games over four divisions be broadcast live?
Would 40-45 live games be better with an option of another 5-10 hence less TV games and disruption?
Better structured highlights deals such as the SFA's Scottish Cup deal and what the SPL had between 1998-2002?
A set TV kick off time? This probably wouldn't work for the broadcasters but it is a discussion to have.
Could the clubs do more to promote the game on TV? Should they give better access to get Sky and BT and BBC interested?
Should fans be more realistic about games being moved?
Should clubs, TV and transport officials work together when games are being rescheduled?
Rather than say 'bin TV' let's look at why we got to this point, where TV and clubs/fans can benefit together and how we can make Scottish football better.
I love when Hibernian are on TV, we get to show off our club to the rest of the UK, Europe and the World.Last edited by DavieRoy; 09-03-2015 at 10:44 AM.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks