nae mare than you spraffing pish. Have you not said yersel' Maybury's not a proirity. And I've stated that Kerr isn't good enough IMHO.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Results 61 to 72 of 72
-
31-07-2012 02:10 PM #61
-
31-07-2012 04:00 PM #62
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 27,490
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Anyway, if a non Tayside team, like Hibs, had those players St Johnstone had in for trial I'm fairly sure you would be the first to be calling it desperate and a failed transfer policy. Their backgrounds are not exactly glowing and yet you are wondering why we aren't looking at similar. Typical of seeing everything good in whatever anyone else does and only bad in what we do.
I also didn't think you were in favour of losing quality like they have this summer and replacing them with inferior players?
-
31-07-2012 04:08 PM #63
How about 3-5-2
With Mcpake Hanlon and Clancy the back 3 and a midfield 5 off Cairney, Lewis,Claros, Ivan, Wotherspoon with (Insert new signing like Lee Miller) and Griffiths as the front 2
Wotherspoon and Ivan can work as wing backs to help out in defence?.
It worked under Mcleish having a back 3
-
31-07-2012 04:20 PM #64
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 1,960
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
A back three of sauzee, laursen and fenwick though wasnt it??
With Matty Jack as defensive mid and latapy, lovell, o'niell et al in midfield...
God how I wish we still had a team with half that ability!
-
31-07-2012 04:23 PM #65This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Spot on mate. Started that 00/01 season in tremendous form and let hardly any goals in to begin with.
What a team we had in that era.
-
31-07-2012 09:10 PM #66
I'd play a 3-5-2. I think Wotherspoon and Booth would be most effective as wingbacks, and our central defence is so shaky that maybe a sweeper system is worth a try (so there is always a bit of cover for slip-ups). I've put Hanlon in midfield because he looks decent on the ball but he isn't strong enough or reliable enough to play in defence. I've left a few spaces for new signings because I simply can't believe we will start the new season with such a lack of decent options (we had a better team in the First Division), but we'll see.
---------------------------Willlams----------------
-------------Clancy--------McPake----------N/S
Wotherspoon---Cairney---Hanlon--------N/S------Booth
----------------------Griffith---N/S--------------
And Sproule should only, EVER, be a sub. That's what he was when he scored a hat trick at Rangers and turned round numerous games for us in 2005-07. His pace is only useful against tired legs.
-
31-07-2012 09:25 PM #67
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Dunbar
- Posts
- 3,061
With a few signings(imminent I hope)
I'd go with:
Williams
Clancy
McPake
Hanlon
Maybury
Claros
Stevenson
Wotherspoon
Forsyth
Griffiths
Sandaza
-
31-07-2012 09:37 PM #68This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Last edited by sahib; 31-07-2012 at 09:39 PM.
-
31-07-2012 10:10 PM #69This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-07-2012 10:18 PM #70This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-07-2012 10:19 PM #71
Dont know why people keep selecting booth, he has hardly featured for god knows how long and clearly wont be starting on Sunday!! And selecting sandaza...never gonna happen unfortunately.
-
31-07-2012 10:30 PM #72This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks