http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...tland-18195970
Am I the only one who finds it quite laughable that such a comment actually lead to a court case?
I'm not advocating threats of violence against anyone and it's far from friendly, but for Lawwell and his band of lawyers to take such a comment to court is laughable. We read throw-away comments online all the time and for Lawwell to come under fire (no correlative pun intended) after some of his recent comments regarding the discussions and actions of the "rebel 10" is hardly a surprise."Lawwell needs a bullet simples!!!"
His [Lawwell's] club manager couldn't be fined by the SPL for something he wrote on Twitter (bearing in mind that it's an officially verified page, so it's clearly Lennon's), so how in the name of goodness can courts take action against such comments, when it's so hard to prove authorship?
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
24-05-2012 05:31 PM #1
Community Service for "Threatening" Celtic Chief Executive
Madness, as you know, is a lot like gravity. All it takes is a little push.
-
24-05-2012 05:35 PM #2
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Age
- 81
- Posts
- 13,825
As this is taking place in a criminal court clearly Lawell and his lawyers did not take him to court but the Crown did and rightly so.There are too many bampots on the internet.
-
24-05-2012 09:10 PM #3
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 1,086
Anyone know why the police said they couldn't prosecute against the Fenian comment on twitter to Ian Murray's twitter?
The PF have the right to prosecute without a complaint or pressing charges in Scotland.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks