hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1004. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    533 53.09%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    447 44.52%
  • In favour.

    24 2.39%
Page 237 of 1480 FirstFirst ... 1371872272352362372382392472873377371237 ... LastLast
Results 7,081 to 7,110 of 44390
  1. #7081
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by green glory View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://twitter.com/bbcchrismclaug/s...04019952111616

    SPL meeting adjourned till the 30th.
    Absolutely delighted if this turns out to be true

    By far the best move by the other teams anyway..


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #7082
    @hibs.net private member Spike Mandela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alloa
    Age
    58
    Posts
    10,794
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Absolutely delighted if this turns out to be true

    By far the best move by the other teams anyway..
    Why? Surely just leaving the door open for Miller to carry out his 'cunning plan' before any new rules in place. Looks like a cowards Kop out to me.

  4. #7083
    Testimonial Due green glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,021
    https://twitter.com/markbenstead/sta...05325441818624

    Great news. The issue of the double contracts is being taken seriously. The Huns only have enough money to keep going till the end of the month too.

  5. #7084
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,046
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Alf R View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Caroline Henderson‏@STVCaroline

    #SPL have adjourned again until 30th #rangers representatives didn't turn up John Yorkston appeared frustrated and disappointed

    Phew! Glad about that because my seat would have lain empty at Hampden if this vote had gone ahead and newco Rangers were to be allowed back in to the SPL. Now I can at least attend the final in good spirits and wait and see what the verdict is from there. Ya beauty!!!!!!

  6. #7085
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike Mandela View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Why? Surely just leaving the door open for Miller to carry out his 'cunning plan' before any new rules in place. Looks like a cowards Kop out to me.
    Bit of a gut feeling Spike, I reckon this Miller deal is very unlikely to fly (the more uncertainty the better tbh) I think this was an desperate attempt by admins/ doncaster/ Rangers to flush out the position of the other SPL chairmen and it hasnt worked. With the uncertainty it means Miller doesnt have any assurances or even know what position the club will be in and is likely to cool interest (if it was ever genuine in the 1st place) Remember the Huns are running out of money very soon indeed, a sale needs to happen desperately and anything that throws a spanner in those works is a good thing IMO. I think they will be liquidated and the ashes bought by the BK, no choice but to apply for SFL div 3 - 'Winning' as Charlie Sheen would say.

  7. #7086
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Bit of a gut feeling Spike, I reckon this Miller deal is very unlikely to fly (the more uncertainty the better tbh) I think this was an desperate attempt by admins/ doncaster/ Rangers to flush out the position of the other SPL chairmen and it hasnt worked. With the uncertainty it means Miller doesnt have any assurances or even know what position the club will be in and is likely to cool interest (if it was ever genuine in the 1st place) Remember the Huns are running out of money very soon indeed, a sale needs to happen desperately and anything that throws a spanner in those works is a good thing IMO. I think they will be liquidated and the ashes bought by the BK, no choice but to apply for SFL div 3 - 'Winning' as Charlie Sheen would say.
    Chris McL:

    Rangers administrators asked for meeting to be adjourned, per Neil Donkey.

  8. #7087
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,076
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Bit of a gut feeling Spike, I reckon this Miller deal is very unlikely to fly (the more uncertainty the better tbh) I think this was an desperate attempt by admins/ doncaster/ Rangers to flush out the position of the other SPL chairmen and it hasnt worked. With the uncertainty it means Miller doesnt have any assurances or even know what position the club will be in and is likely to cool interest (if it was ever genuine in the 1st place) Remember the Huns are running out of money very soon indeed, a sale needs to happen desperately and anything that throws a spanner in those works is a good thing IMO. I think they will be liquidated and the ashes bought by the BK, no choice but to apply for SFL div 3 - 'Winning' as Charlie Sheen would say.

    Forcing Duff and Duffer to put the Beast down, no blood on their hands all the admins fault.

  9. #7088
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Bit of a gut feeling Spike, I reckon this Miller deal is very unlikely to fly (the more uncertainty the better tbh) I think this was an desperate attempt by admins/ doncaster/ Rangers to flush out the position of the other SPL chairmen and it hasnt worked. With the uncertainty it means Miller doesnt have any assurances or even know what position the club will be in and is likely to cool interest (if it was ever genuine in the 1st place) Remember the Huns are running out of money very soon indeed, a sale needs to happen desperately and anything that throws a spanner in those works is a good thing IMO. I think they will be liquidated and the ashes bought by the BK, no choice but to apply for SFL div 3 - 'Winning' as Charlie Sheen would say.
    Does Der Hun not turning up just show the contempt that they hold the others in this league?

    Much as i am enjoying the slow painful death of them, I am all for ending them now!

  10. #7089
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by H18SVG View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Isn't it the case that Bill Miller has to pay 1/2 million pounds for preferred bidder status? That might indicate a level of interest, whether the interest remains after full disclosure is another matter. It's certainly an odd acquisition for Bill Miller.
    That 500k is included in his 11.2M bid IIRC. Certainly not been paid upfront.

  11. #7090
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by ancienthibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Chris McL:

    Rangers administrators asked for meeting to be adjourned, per Neil Donkey.

    Still in our best interests IMO

  12. #7091
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    28,937
    Quote Originally Posted by ancienthibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Chris McL:

    Rangers administrators asked for meeting to be adjourned, per Neil Donkey.
    Even althought they weren't there?

  13. #7092
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by greenginger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Forcing Duff and Duffer to put the Beast down, no blood on their hands all the admins fault.
    Cant do multi-quote (sorry all) but yes, this is what I think. Bring it on.

  14. #7093
    Quote Originally Posted by green glory View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://twitter.com/bbcchrismclaug/s...04019952111616

    SPL meeting adjourned till the 30th.
    Of course, from reading Twitter today sounds like the entire club has decamped to Belfast to give it 'No Surrender' with their mates from Linfield!

  15. #7094
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by H18SVG View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Cheers,
    Does that mean the blue knights also paid £500k or do they only take it from the preferred bidder?
    Not entirely sure to be honest, I'll see if I can find where I read that - remember though, at first it was 1M to secure preferred bidder status which somehow (without much comment) became 500k. I would guess that nobody actually wanted to stump it up and it was included in all full bids - I read that as 'a dead horse being flogged' but sure the financial types have their own (more informed) view.

  16. #7095
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    9,488
    Quote Originally Posted by H18SVG
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    Cheers,
    Does that mean the blue knights also paid £500k or do they only take it from the preferred bidder?
    Blue knights have paid hee haw.

  17. #7096
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    28,937
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Not entirely sure to be honest, I'll see if I can find where I read that - remember though, at first it was 1M to secure preferred bidder status which somehow (without much comment) became 500k. I would guess that nobody actually wanted to stump it up and it was included in all full bids - I read that as 'a dead horse being flogged' but sure the financial types have their own (more informed) view.
    I remember it as being $1m, not £1m.

    And it is only the preferred bidder that pays.

  18. #7097
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I remember it as being $1m, not £1m.

    And it is only the preferred bidder that pays.
    Are you sure of that CWG? I seem to remember it beng quoted before international bids were known and it was in £ - what is the exchange rate anyway?
    Last edited by EuanH78; 07-05-2012 at 03:40 PM. Reason: typo

  19. #7098
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    28,937
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Are you sure of that CWG? I seem to remember it beng quoted before international bids were known and it was in £ - what is the exchange rate anyway?
    Nope

  20. #7099
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in the town
    Age
    60
    Posts
    11,873
    Looks like one of the reasons for the delay was to allow all clubs vote on newco as per BBC

    However, an SPL spokesperson said the 11 member clubs present at Monday's meeting "unanimously called for the power to deal with any newco application to be moved from the board to the clubs".
    "This requires 21 clear days' notice," added the spokesperson. "The clubs will therefore meet again on 30 May to consider a resolution designed to achieve this.
    "In the event that an application for transfer of share to a newco is received before 30 May, then it can be dealt with by the SPL board.
    "The SPL board have indicated that they would, in those circumstances, call together the clubs before any such decision was made.
    "For the avoidance of doubt, no decision on any transfer of a share to a newco has yet been made; nor has any such application been received.

    By the way when does a member club cease to be a member following relegation?

  21. #7100
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Nope
    Anyway still doesnt stack up whether it was $1M or £1M, its now £500k and we'll throw in a gourd and a false beard as well.

  22. #7101
    Full BBC story:

    SPL delay decisions on financial fair play and voting rights

    By Chris McLaughlinSenior Football Reporter, BBC Scotland

    Scottish Premier League clubs meeting at Hampden have delayed voting on financial fair play rules until 30 May.
    Proposed resolutions include the docking of 10 points for two seasons for clubs who wish to transfer their share in the league to a new company.
    Dunfermline chairman John Yorkston said clubs were seeking more information.
    Rangers, whose prospective owner Bill Miller is keen on a transfer of assets to a newco, did not attend Monday's SPL meeting but asked for the adjournment.
    Administrators Duff & Phelps have selected American Miller as preferred bidder to take control of the Ibrox club and he plans to move Rangers' assets, including their share in the SPL, players and premises, to an 'incubator' company whilst the debts of the existing business are dealt with.
    SPL PROPOSALS

    • Minimum of 15 points deducted from any club entering administration
    • 10-point penalty for two seasons for any club that transfers its share in the SPL to a new company
    • 75% reduction in payments to any club relaunched as a new company for a period of three seasons
    • Requirement for clubs to pay players on time and to report any failure to pay wages
    • Requirement for clubs to report any failure to pay PAYE/NIC
    • Player registration embargo imposed on any club failing to pay PAYE/NIC

    Under current guidelines, an application for transfer of share to a newco would be ruled upon by the SPL board, which comprises chief executive Neil Doncaster, secretary Ralph Topping, Celtic director Eric Riley, Dundee United chairman Stephen Thompson, St Johnstone chairman Steve Brown and Motherwell director Derek Weir.
    However, an SPL spokesperson said the 11 member clubs present at Monday's meeting "unanimously called for the power to deal with any newco application to be moved from the board to the clubs".
    "This requires 21 clear days' notice," added the spokesperson. "The clubs will therefore meet again on 30 May to consider a resolution designed to achieve this.
    "In the event that an application for transfer of share to a newco is received before 30 May, then it can be dealt with by the SPL board.
    "The SPL board have indicated that they would, in those circumstances, call together the clubs before any such decision was made.
    "For the avoidance of doubt, no decision on any transfer of a share to a newco has yet been made; nor has any such application been received."
    The proposed new financial fair play rules, which also include a minimum 15-point penalty for any club entering administration and requirements for clubs to pay player wages on time, were due to take effect from 14 May had they been passed.
    "It took a long time to not decide anything," said Yorkston.
    "We need to know more information, we were hoping it would get resolved at this meeting.
    "We all want to make quick decisions and come out with what the story is but we don't have enough information."
    Top flight clubs were also due to vote on whether to change the league's voting stucture but that too has been delayed until the end of May.
    A resolution has been proposed to replace the current 11-1 majority required to effect major changes with a 9-3 ballot.

  23. #7102
    @hibs.net private member greenlex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    27,687
    Quote Originally Posted by PatHead View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Looks like one of the reasons for the delay was to allow all clubs vote on newco as per BBC

    However, an SPL spokesperson said the 11 member clubs present at Monday's meeting "unanimously called for the power to deal with any newco application to be moved from the board to the clubs".
    "This requires 21 clear days' notice," added the spokesperson. "The clubs will therefore meet again on 30 May to consider a resolution designed to achieve this.
    "In the event that an application for transfer of share to a newco is received before 30 May, then it can be dealt with by the SPL board.
    "The SPL board have indicated that they would, in those circumstances, call together the clubs before any such decision was made.
    "For the avoidance of doubt, no decision on any transfer of a share to a newco has yet been made; nor has any such application been received.

    By the way when does a member club cease to be a member following relegation?

    So 21 days notice to remove the newco nonsense from the SPL board and back to the clubs. Why wasnt that notice given at or prior to the last meeting? Coveniently gets us past the end of the season now. I smell a dirty great big rat. Not happy at all.


  24. #7103
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    28,937
    Quote Originally Posted by greenlex View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    So 21 days notice to remove the newco nonsense from the SPL board and back to the clubs. Why wasnt that notice given at or prior to the last meeting? Coveniently gets us past the end of the season now. I smell a dirty great big rat. Not happy at all.

    Don't agree. I think all the clubs have considered their positions over the past couple of weeks and decided that this is just too big a decision for the 6-person Board.

  25. #7104
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by greenlex View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    So 21 days notice to remove the newco nonsense from the SPL board and back to the clubs. Why wasnt that notice given at or prior to the last meeting? Coveniently gets us past the end of the season now. I smell a dirty great big rat. Not happy at all.

    Arent you encouraged that the clubs want this to go to full vote in first place?

  26. #7105
    Testimonial Due blindsummit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Kamloops, BC
    Posts
    1,167
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Anyway still doesnt stack up whether it was $1M or £1M, its now £500k and we'll throw in a gourd and a false beard as well.
    Don't you want to haggle

  27. #7106
    @hibs.net private member Mikey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    56
    Posts
    56,091
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Don't agree. I think all the clubs have considered their positions over the past couple of weeks and decided that this is just too big a decision for the 6-person Board.
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Arent you encouraged that the clubs want this to go to full vote in first place?
    It's certainly to our advantage that the clubs will vote and not the board.

  28. #7107
    Testimonial Due bighairyfaeleith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sunshine City
    Posts
    4,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikey View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's certainly to our advantage that the clubs will vote and not the board.
    agreed, although what numbers do we need to block them getting in??

  29. #7108
    @hibs.net private member Don Giovanni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,021
    Quote Originally Posted by EuanH78 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Arent you encouraged that the clubs want this to go to full vote in first place?
    Is the issue not that the clubs may not get to vote on a Rangers newco if the SPL board are able to sneak it through before the 30th of May? Doncaster and Topping have been pretty explicit about how they would vote afterall.

    The clubs are certainly giving the impression of wanting to take responsibility for the descion but the SPL board could hang them out to dry before they have the power to do so...?

  30. #7109
    @hibs.net private member Spike Mandela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alloa
    Age
    58
    Posts
    10,794
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by PatHead View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Looks like one of the reasons for the delay was to allow all clubs vote on newco as per BBC

    However, an SPL spokesperson said the 11 member clubs present at Monday's meeting "unanimously called for the power to deal with any newco application to be moved from the board to the clubs".
    "This requires 21 clear days' notice," added the spokesperson. "The clubs will therefore meet again on 30 May to consider a resolution designed to achieve this.
    "In the event that an application for transfer of share to a newco is received before 30 May, then it can be dealt with by the SPL board.
    "The SPL board have indicated that they would, in those circumstances, call together the clubs before any such decision was made.
    "For the avoidance of doubt, no decision on any transfer of a share to a newco has yet been made; nor has any such application been received.

    By the way when does a member club cease to be a member following relegation?
    Hibs or Dunfermline will cease to be an SPL club at the end of this week and their vote will be taken by Ross County.

    How convenient.
    Last edited by Spike Mandela; 07-05-2012 at 04:20 PM.

  31. #7110
    First Team Regular EuanH78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Giovanni View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Is the issue not that the clubs may not get to vote on a Rangers newco if the SPL board are able to sneak it through before the 30th of May? Doncaster and Topping have been pretty explicit about how they would vote afterall.

    The clubs are certainly giving the impression of wanting to take responsibility for the descion but the SPL board could hang them out to dry before they have the power to do so...?
    I'm not so sure Rangers/ Miller can push this through as quick as they might like.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)