hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1004. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    533 53.09%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    447 44.52%
  • In favour.

    24 2.39%
Page 137 of 1480 FirstFirst ... 37871271351361371381391471872376371137 ... LastLast
Results 4,081 to 4,110 of 44390
  1. #4081
    @hibs.net private member StevieC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    8,619
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy74 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    In the current set up would the second placed team not get the invite?
    That depends on the outcome of the "second contract" investigation.
    But you know it ain't all about wealth,
    as long as you make a note to .. EXPRESS YOURSELF!


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #4082
    First Team Regular Big Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    58
    Posts
    829
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here.

    1. The BTC, which (given its alleged double-contract issues) is at the heart of Rangers' demise, is still undecided.

    2. The double-contracts have only be brought to the SFA's attention recently.

    3. The overspending is not the SFA's concern, as long as RFC are still meeting their bills and football responsibilities. It's only recently that they haven't.

    With all that in mind, it's difficult to see what the SFA/SPL could have done until now.
    If you have the time and inclination, this article outlines the broad gist of my feelings towards the SFA's conduct regarding the Rangers takeover: http://scotslawthoughts.wordpress.co...-for-mr-regan/

  4. #4083
    @hibs.net private member Mikey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    56
    Posts
    56,091
    Quote Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    BBC Chris McLaughlin tweets that Brian Kennedy's bid is dead. Rejected by admins.
    Aye. We've banned the **** too

  5. #4084
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy74 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think they can run the numbers, it's getting an auditor to sign them that will be the problem.

    Last years accounts were signed by the auditors and the Hearts Director on 31/3/2011 and they were not lodged at Companies House until 13th May doubling their penalty .

  6. #4085
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy74 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    In the current set up would the second placed team not get the invite?
    That was not the case when Falkirk failed the ground requirements in 2002-3.

    Motherwell escaped the drop despite finishing bottom.

    I have a feeling that Aberdeen who finished bottom in 1999-2000 should have gone through a play-off with Falkirk (3rd in the SFL1). That was the year that the SPL was expanded from 10 to 12. They got off the hook because of Fakirk's stadium.
    Last edited by jgl07; 29-03-2012 at 02:17 PM.

  7. #4086
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy74 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    In the current set up would the second placed team not get the invite?
    Short answer, no.

    Longer answer - SPL rules:

    A2.3 In the event that the Candidate Club for any Season, if promoted from the SFL and admitted entry to the League, would, in the opinion of the Board in its absolute discretion, fail to fully comply with the Membership Criteria and no waiver, relaxation or period of grace is or has been granted to the Candidate Club in terms of Rule A2.7, then the Candidate Club shall not be promoted from the SFL and admitted entry to the League and the Club which would otherwise have been relegated from the League to the SFL in accordance with Rule A2.1, shall retain its place in the League.

  8. #4087
    @hibs.net private member Jim44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    76
    Posts
    22,149
    Blog Entries
    1
    Has Ross County not applied to share ICT's ground next yea? I should imagine permission will be a formality.

  9. #4088
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim44 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Has Ross County not applied to share ICT's ground next yea? I should imagine permission will be a formality.
    They have the alterations under way but they will not be completed by the cut-off date but should certainly be ready for next season.

    They have applied for a ground share as a back-up plan.

    I don't see an issue with Ross County.

  10. #4089
    @hibs.net private member Hibernia&Alba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ma bit
    Posts
    19,745
    So that's Kennedy finished. Is he going to buy Hibs instead?


    This talked about party in Singapore. Anyone have info regarding how serious they are?
    HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875

  11. #4090
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    35,079
    Not sure if already posted but, Duff and Duffer are on course to cost Rangers up to 3,000,0000 quid in Administration Costs. The calculation is based on them being in Administration until July, which I doubt, but if so, it would wipe out totally any savings made by reducing the players wages.


    Going by that calculation, they must have cost rangers a good million quid at least by now


    Dontcha just LOVE these people

  12. #4091
    Testimonial Due green glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,021
    SFA hearing adjourned till 17th, 18th and 19th of April at the behest of CW's lawyers. Procedural hearing set for the 6th which CW is expected to attend.

    Also D+P seem to be getting panicky. CW won't sell his shares to the Blue Knight/Paul Murray consortium, and they've rejected Brian Kennedy's bid, apparently wanting a buyer in place by Wednesday. **** creek beckons.

  13. #4092
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    49
    Posts
    27,490
    Quote Originally Posted by green glory View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    SFA hearing adjourned till 17th, 18th and 19th of April at the behest of CW's lawyers. Procedural hearing set for the 6th which CW is expected to attend.

    Also D+P seem to be getting panicky. CW won't sell his shares to the Blue Knight/Paul Murray consortium, and they've rejected Brian Kennedy's bid, apparently wanting a buyer in place by Wednesday. **** creek beckons.
    Any delay can only add to the uncertainty for bidders.

    Brain Kennedy just likes to see his name written down. Maybe he could save the money to get those sunglasses surgically removed from his face.

  14. #4093
    @hibs.net private member Part/Time Supporter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Cornwall
    Age
    41
    Posts
    14,570
    Quote Originally Posted by Hibernia&Alba View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So that's Kennedy finished. Is he going to buy Hibs instead?
    The last time he showed an interest in Hibs was just after relegation.


  15. #4094
    @hibs.net private member Spike Mandela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alloa
    Age
    58
    Posts
    10,794
    Blog Entries
    1
    Whyte doesn't want to sell his shares to Murray....

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/footbal...6908-23805466/

  16. #4095
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike Mandela View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Whyte doesn't want to sell his shares to Murray....

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/footbal...6908-23805466/
    You mean Whyte does not wish to give his shares to Murray.

  17. #4096
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    35,079
    Does anyone else remember THIS story, Rangers planning to increase the size of Ibrox to 70,000, or some such fairy tale.


    Just three years later and Rangers are almost down the pan. At the time that he was making these b*ll*x claims, he must have known Rangers were already in trouble, yet the media just all lapped it up, as per usual.

  18. #4097
    @hibs.net private member Golden Bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    15,173
    Even the Administrators are at it now!




    http://sport.stv.tv/football/scottis...-ticket-money/

  19. #4098
    @hibs.net private member Hibernia&Alba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ma bit
    Posts
    19,745
    Quote Originally Posted by keekaboo View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Does anyone else remember THIS story, Rangers planning to increase the size of Ibrox to 70,000, or some such fairy tale.


    Just three years later and Rangers are almost down the pan. At the time that he was making these b*ll*x claims, he must have known Rangers were already in trouble, yet the media just all lapped it up, as per usual.

    Aye, David Murray had the media in the palm of his hand. I remember that: massive new Ibrox, casinos, hotels etc. Yet at the same time they were fiddling their taxes. The laptop loyal swallowed it as per.
    HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875

  20. #4099
    Quote Originally Posted by jgl07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    You mean Whyte does not wish to give his shares to Murray.
    It's quite amazing what a few weeks can bring!

    Now we seem to have the principal player, one Craikie NotsoWhyte, at loggerheads with the team he chose to appoint, Duff and Duffer.

    At 'the Big Hoose' the foundations are crumbling!

    Bring it on!

  21. #4100
    @hibs.net private member Hibernia&Alba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ma bit
    Posts
    19,745
    Quote Originally Posted by ancienthibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's quite amazing what a few weeks can bring!

    Now we seem to have the principal player, one Craikie NotsoWhyte, at loggerheads with the team he chose to appoint, Duff and Duffer.

    At 'the Big Hoose' the foundations are crumbling!

    Bring it on!
    One feels duty bound to express ones approval of this insight
    HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875

  22. #4101
    Coaching Staff IWasThere2016's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Monifieth & Bolton
    Age
    56
    Posts
    35,323
    Quote Originally Posted by ancienthibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's quite amazing what a few weeks can bring!

    Now we seem to have the principal player, one Craikie NotsoWhyte, at loggerheads with the team he chose to appoint, Duff and Duffer.

    At 'the Big Hoose' the foundations are crumbling!

    Bring it on!
    Isn't this just magic .. The win in the BigotFest on Sunday is the last thing they'll celebrate hopefully.

    OF GTF!

  23. #4102
    @hibs.net private member CallumLaidlaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Rosyth, Fife
    Age
    42
    Posts
    14,726
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: Cal_hibby
    Quote Originally Posted by jgl07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    They have the alterations under way but they will not be completed by the cut-off date but should certainly be ready for next season.

    They have applied for a ground share as a back-up plan.

    I don't see an issue with Ross County.
    Just tweeted by a journo an hour ago -
    the SPL have approved Ross County's application to groundshare with Inverness next season

  24. #4103
    Testimonial Due James70's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Caledonia
    Posts
    1,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike Mandela View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Whyte doesn't want to sell his shares to Murray....

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/footbal...6908-23805466/

    Don't worry, it'll be all Whyte on the Knight!

  25. #4104
    Quote Originally Posted by Golden Bear View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Even the Administrators are at it now!




    http://sport.stv.tv/football/scottis...-ticket-money/
    Totally Hunbelievable :green grin At this rate, teams will stop playing he Huns long before they go into liquidation.

    You just can trust the Hun

  26. #4105
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,076
    Quote Originally Posted by CallumLaidlaw View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Just tweeted by a journo an hour ago -
    the SPL have approved Ross County's application to groundshare with Inverness next season

    Thats one " get out of jail card " we can't play.

  27. #4106
    Coaching Staff IWasThere2016's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Monifieth & Bolton
    Age
    56
    Posts
    35,323
    Quote Originally Posted by greenginger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Thats one " get out of jail card " we can't play.
    Ross Co. plan to build and be ready for 1 July. The ICT groundshare is just a contingency.

  28. #4107
    Left by mutual consent! PaulSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,864
    On the charges brought by the SFA against Rangers:

    Paul Clark, of administrators Duff and Phelps, said: "The club's legal representatives were ready to make the club's case which in essence is that there are extenuating and unprecedented circumstances in this case and we hope to demonstrate the distinction between the actions of the club and the actions of individuals.

    If the SFA agree to this and see it as actions of an individual they might as well rip up the rule book?

  29. #4108
    Solipsist Eyrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    PDSBRS
    Posts
    13,151
    The SFA have already stated that they have neither the resources nor the time to vet every appointment at every member club, and they have over 100 clubs as members. They rely on each club to do its own checks and then vouch for the appointment, which is why the Huns can't simply claim Whyte misled them.

  30. #4109
    Quote Originally Posted by Eyrie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The SFA have already stated that they have neither the resources nor the time to vet every appointment at every member club, and they have over 100 clubs as members. They rely on each club to do its own checks and then vouch for the appointment, which is why the Huns can't simply claim Whyte misled them.
    I'm still astonished that Duff and Duffer (as supposedly serious admins) came out with the phrase "Craig Whyte is irrelevant to Rangers future", he being the owner and majority shareholder of the football club, and the guy who paid to inherit (and then further scam) the broken and bankrupt company that David Murray had already taken to its knees, via HMRC.

    Will Duff and Duffer find work again?

  31. #4110
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    8,338
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    On the charges brought by the SFA against Rangers:

    Paul Clark, of administrators Duff and Phelps, said: "The club's legal representatives were ready to make the club's case which in essence is that there are extenuating and unprecedented circumstances in this case and we hope to demonstrate the distinction between the actions of the club and the actions of individuals.

    If the SFA agree to this and see it as actions of an individual they might as well rip up the rule book?
    Does anyone else here think this is a rather weak excuse?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)