Generic Sevco / Rangers meltdown thread

[HoboHarry]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Latest piece from JJ.

https://johnjamessite.com/

Now I know he can spraff a load of bollocks, but if a fraction of this is true, then the **** will hit the fan of the Scottish Legal system.

Correct - popcorn time if even some of it is true......

[brog]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Latest piece from JJ.

https://johnjamessite.com/

Now I know he can spraff a load of bollocks, but if a fraction of this is true, then the **** will hit the fan of the Scottish Legal system.

It looks & reads like a very genuine document. Quite amazing & shameful also. It sounds like The Sevco Cop, Jim Robertson, was based on the corrupt Jambo cop in Filth. IIRC he was also named Robertson, Irvine's wee dig at Round Robbo!

[Hibby70]

Well I don't think it's something someone else would just make up.

[CropleyWasGod]

"I will publish comments that I don’t agree with"

[Ozyhibby]

No idea if true or not but very believable. If you want to get into crime, make sure it’s the white collar type. When it comes to allocating police resources, the cries of ‘we need more bobbies on the street’ are always heeded before the hiring of accountants.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Billy Whizz]

Can someone please summarise the popcorn bits please

[fat freddy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Can someone please summarise the popcorn bits please

You'll need a bumper bag of popcorn to take in the latest scandal. You need to read it, the scale of institutional corruption surrounding Rangers is staggering.
I wonder what Rangers song Robertson sang as he intimidated his victim? Truly Mental!

[Jack Hackett]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You'll need a bumper bag of popcorn to take in the latest scandal. You need to read it, the scale of institutional corruption surrounding Rangers is staggering.
I wonder what Rangers song Robertson sang as he intimidated his victim? Truly Mental!

Even money on something containing the phrase 'Fenian blood'

[CropleyWasGod]

I wonder if JJ has got hold of a storm in a teacup.

I've had a few dealings with the Justice Committee over the years. They're pretty strict about their deadlines for one thing. I see that the alleged submission was written on the day of the deadline. Perhaps, quite simply, it was submitted late and therefore not accepted.

All JC submissions have to be published, supportive or not.

The other thing that strikes me is that this all took place in October 2016. Surely, if the submission was "refused", we would have heard about it by now. The complainer would have found a way to get it out there.

Finally, JJ asserts that the complainer won't be unhappy that it's now in the public domain. I'm not so sure. The defenders in his £9m (?) civil case would jump on it as being prejudicial.

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

[HoboHarry]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I wonder if JJ has got hold of a storm in a teacup.

I've had a few dealings with the Justice Committee over the years. They're pretty strict about their deadlines for one thing. I see that the alleged submission was written on the day of the deadline. Perhaps, quite simply, it was submitted late and therefore not accepted.

All JC submissions have to be published, supportive or not.

The other thing that strikes me is that this all took place in October 2016. Surely, if the submission was "refused", we would have heard about it by now. The complainer would have found a way to get it out there.

Finally, JJ asserts that the complainer won't be unhappy that it's now in the public domain. I'm not so sure. The defenders in his £9m (?) civil case would jump on it as being prejudicial.

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

Stop raining on our parade ya w****r.......

[CropleyWasGod]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Stop raining on our parade ya w****r.......

🤣🤣🤣

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

[greenginger]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I wonder if JJ has got hold of a storm in a teacup.

I've had a few dealings with the Justice Committee over the years. They're pretty strict about their deadlines for one thing. I see that the alleged submission was written on the day of the deadline. Perhaps, quite simply, it was submitted late and therefore not accepted.

All JC submissions have to be published, supportive or not.

The other thing that strikes me is that this all took place in October 2016. Surely, if the submission was "refused", we would have heard about it by now. The complainer would have found a way to get it out there.

Finally, JJ asserts that the complainer won't be unhappy that it's now in the public domain. I'm not so sure. The defenders in his £9m (?) civil case would jump on it as being prejudicial.

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

The submission is headed " Submission by David Whitehouse to the COPFS Inquiry Wednesday 19th October. "

Could that date not be descriptive of the Inquiry rather than the date it was actually written ?

[CropleyWasGod]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The submission is headed " Submission by David Whitehouse to the COPFS Inquiry Wednesday 19th October. "

Could that date not be descriptive of the Inquiry rather than the date it was actually written ?

I looked at the JC website, and the deadline for submissions was ( I think..I'm on my phone, so can't double check) the same day.

The process is that all submissions are made by a certain date. The admin staff then collate them, publish them on the website..... and then the JC consider them in their own meetings.

They may also have taken oral evidence, but that would be after the deadline date.

It is possible that the JC did accept the submission, but decided not to publish it, in view of its potential for prejudicing the civil case...but AFAIK they should publish every submission.

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

[Stonewall]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I wonder if JJ has got hold of a storm in a teacup.

I've had a few dealings with the Justice Committee over the years. They're pretty strict about their deadlines for one thing. I see that the alleged submission was written on the day of the deadline. Perhaps, quite simply, it was submitted late and therefore not accepted.

All JC submissions have to be published, supportive or not.

The other thing that strikes me is that this all took place in October 2016. Surely, if the submission was "refused", we would have heard about it by now. The complainer would have found a way to get it out there.

Finally, JJ asserts that the complainer won't be unhappy that it's now in the public domain. I'm not so sure. The defenders in his £9m (?) civil case would jump on it as being prejudicial.

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

Distracts attention from the questions over Duff and Phelps' conduct of Rangers' liquidation though.

[CropleyWasGod]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Distracts attention from the questions over Duff and Phelps' conduct of Rangers' liquidation though.

BDO have a civil case pending.

As JJ suggests, though, any criminal case went out the window with the ineptitude of the polis.

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

[CropleyWasGod]

In other news, TRFC have increased their turnover......

And doubled their losses

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

[HoboHarry]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

In other news, TRFC have increased their turnover......

And doubled their losses

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

Seriously? Is there a link to the figures?

[JeMeSouviens]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Seriously? Is there a link to the figures?

https://media.rangers.co.uk/uploads/2017/11/Rangers-Reports-and-Accounts-2017.pdf

They need another £4M of loans to get through this season and are forecasting needing £3.2M next.

[Radium]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CallumLaidlaw]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

https://media.rangers.co.uk/uploads/2017/11/Rangers-Reports-and-Accounts-2017.pdf

They need another £4M of loans to get through this season and are forecasting needing £3.2M next.

Yet they choose to pay Pena & Alves upwards of £25k a week. Absolutely insane.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ozyhibby]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Yet they choose to pay Pena & Alves upwards of £25k a week. Absolutely insane.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Without FFP in Scotland they will get away with it. Run a bit short? No probs, just get another loan from a mysterious source in Asia.
Just need to move on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HoboHarry]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

In other news, TRFC have increased their turnover......

And doubled their losses

Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk

Come on mate - get on the phone to Caversham Green and gie us yer best overall view of the figures provided.......

[wookie70]

At some point the money will run out and we will have to decide if The The Rangers can be let back in again without penalty

https://stv.tv/sport/football/140149...st-free-loans/

[ano hibby]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Yet they choose to pay Pena & Alves upwards of £25k a week. Absolutely insane.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Surely not?
£2.5m a year on 2 players...those 2 players too😂

[Hibernia&Alba]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

At some point the money will run out and we will have to decide if The The Rangers can be let back in again without penalty

https://stv.tv/sport/football/140149...st-free-loans/

Of course they'd be allowed to stroll back in again, claiming starting in League Two following liquidation IS punishment. The precedent has been set: illegal use of tax schemes is fine.

[Eyrie]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

At some point the money will run out and we will have to decide if The The Rangers can be let back in again without penalty

https://stv.tv/sport/football/140149...st-free-loans/

They won't be allowed back in, but following precedent The The Rangers will take their place.

Question - will we call the next club based at Ibrox The The Rangers, The Sevco or just Huns?

[Bostonhibby]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

They won't be allowed back in, but following precedent The The Rangers will take their place.

Question - will we call the next club based at Ibrox The The Rangers, The Sevco or just Huns?

The team formerly known as the team that replaced the now defunct Glasgow rangers?

Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

[The Pointer]

This piece from STV is such good news. We've been waiting a long time and our patience is unquenchable. Drip, drip, drip.....

[Hibernia&Alba]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

They won't be allowed back in, but following precedent The The Rangers will take their place.

Question - will we call the next club based at Ibrox The The Rangers, The Sevco or just Huns?

Rangers the Third. It's rhyming slang tae.

[Bostonhibby]

The Loan rangers.