Just seen the resolutions on their website, all of their directors re-elected with around 87.5% of the vote while King didn't even receive 75% of the vote... King on a shoogly peg already or is it looking too far into it? Just very strange as 13% is a lot of votes.
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1004. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
533 53.09% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
447 44.52% -
In favour.
24 2.39%
Results 35,461 to 35,490 of 44390
-
28-11-2016 05:09 PM #35461
-
28-11-2016 05:32 PM #35462
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Age
- 81
- Posts
- 13,825
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
What percentage does Ashley hold?
-
28-11-2016 05:57 PM #35463This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk
-
30-11-2016 10:20 AM #35464
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/f...europe-9360873
For those that won't read the DR:-
Rangers will have to ask UEFA for special dispensation to play in Europe next season due to their failure to meet Financial Fair Play regulations.
Club licensing rules state that losses over the most recent three-year period shouldn’t exceed £4,265,000 – and Gers have lost £18.9million since 2014.
UEFA do allow a deficit during that time frame to reach £25.9million but only “if such excess is entirely covered by contributions from equity participants and/or related parties”.
But an SFA source confirmed that Rangers would need to prove to UEFA that they can reduce their losses and continue as a going concern if they qualify for Europe.
He said: “I suspect that UEFA would grant special dispensation to them because there have been several instances of other clubs, in similar circumstances, being permitted to participate.
Rangers’ latest accounts disclosed they had required £2.9m in soft loans from directors since the end of the financial year and that more will be needed to complete the current campaign.
-
30-11-2016 10:36 AM #35465This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It's up to Hearts and Aberdeen to step up to the plate here. It's them who will miss out if the SFA wave them through. What's the point of FFP rules if they are to be ignored?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
30-11-2016 10:45 AM #35466This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Based on that DR piece (yeah, i know ), I would suggest that the "excess" they have to cover is "only" £7m. Given that they've paid in £2.9m of that already, it's not too much of a stretch to get the rest, especially if it means that they're going to have European football.
Anyways, I'm suspicious about the timing of this story. There's a long way to go before the end of the season. Of more pressing importance is the latest MA court case. Any news?
-
30-11-2016 10:50 AM #35467This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
30-11-2016 11:08 AM #35468This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
-
30-11-2016 11:20 AM #35470
I'm not so sure EUFA will allow them if there is no proof of going concern. Celtic and Resolution 12 has put a bloody great thorn in the side of 'just make it happen' (SFA) therefore, think or I would guess due diligence, history and careful consideration of res12, EUFA will deny them next year. I also don't think they will finish in the top four.
-
30-11-2016 11:23 AM #35471This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They also have a going concern qualification on their accounts.
I think it's the SFA who do the licensing for UEFA.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
30-11-2016 11:37 AM #35472
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/1...in_trademarks/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
30-11-2016 12:35 PM #35473This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It would appear they have set out to sabotage a legally binding commercial agreement from 2012 by backdoor means.
Could be trouble ahead for the new huns?Last edited by northstandhibby; 30-11-2016 at 12:42 PM.
-
30-11-2016 02:25 PM #35474
http://stv.tv/sport/football/1374309...ampaign=buffer
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
30-11-2016 02:25 PM #35475This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2016 03:25 PM #35476This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2016 05:41 PM #35477
- Join Date
- Nov 2016
- Posts
- 2,381
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2016 05:47 PM #35478This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think Res11 will become Res1 pretty soon
Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk
-
30-11-2016 05:51 PM #35479
- Join Date
- Nov 2016
- Posts
- 2,381
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-11-2016 08:26 PM #35480This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk
-
01-12-2016 04:17 PM #35481
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 2,675
There's a rumour that Warburton offered his resignation after last night's game. I suspect he's already got a new job - leader of UKIP.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Warburton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Nuttall
-
02-12-2016 08:19 AM #35482
Spoke to a guy this morning who claims to be in the know in regards to the the rangers. He says that the red bull deal would inject a huge amount of cash into the club but there's two sticking points, naming rights for the team and ibrox and the Ashley deal, which is why they are so desperate to rid themselves of the Sports Direct deal. He said the naming rights aren't an issue as long as rangers and ibrox are included in the new names but the Ashley thing might stop the deal going through.
I only just met the guy this morning so it could all be BS but it's always nice to pass on stuff you hear from the orc followers 😂
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
-
02-12-2016 08:26 AM #35483This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my HTC One mini 2 using Tapatalk
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
-
02-12-2016 08:34 AM #35484This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Personally I can't imagine RB going near the orcs but you never know.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
-
02-12-2016 08:40 AM #35485This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Many "synergies" here and changing their name to the Trumpets isn't that much of a leap.
Sent from my HTC One mini 2 using Tapatalk
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
-
02-12-2016 08:42 AM #35486This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
-
02-12-2016 08:44 AM #35487This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The Red Bull-s**t Arena has a certain ring to it !
-
04-12-2016 11:42 PM #35488
This is worth a read, especially the bit about Sevco.
http://www.sportslawscotland.co.uk/?m=1
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
05-12-2016 06:05 AM #35489This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
UEFA may choose (and possibly likely they will) to offer a settlement agreement, under Article 15, in a bid to allow the club to financially rehabilitate themselves and set out a 'roadmap' to reach break even, in the foreseeable future. This will allow the club to compete in competitions.
Also, in theory, Sevco have the Lying King's £30m () warchest in reserve which might mitigate any bother they find themselves in.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]
-
05-12-2016 08:37 AM #35490This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
" Rehabilitate themselves " ? to what, they've only got 4 years of accounts and they show nothing but accumulating losses.
They are not going to flag up old Co. with their massive tax debts.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks