hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: from where does the problem stem?

Voters
80. You may not vote on this poll
  • the players

    17 21.25%
  • the manager

    3 3.75%
  • the board

    10 12.50%
  • the board through to the manager

    5 6.25%
  • the board through to the players

    22 27.50%
  • the manager through to the players

    1 1.25%
  • the players and the board (the manager's not been here long)

    16 20.00%
  • colin nish

    6 7.50%
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    @hibs.net private member AgentDaleCooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    not sure
    Age
    36
    Posts
    5,367

    from where does the problem stem?

    ...and how can we fix it?

    EDIT: forgot to add a ;) to option 8...



    i personally think it's the board that are the root of the problem - they've allowed us to list into a false sense of grandeur without ensuring that the team on the park was being bolstered enough to make progress. i honestly think the club needs a radically different approach from an executive level - a board that ONLY wants results. hell, i'd take some mad russian millionaire if it meant escaping this purgatory.
    Last edited by AgentDaleCooper; 30-01-2011 at 02:10 PM.

  2. #2
    Read the article re RP in today's Sunday Mail - don't think it's too far off the mark.

  3. #3

  4. #4
    Left by mutual consent! Phil D. Rolls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh, N.B.
    Posts
    23,448
    Blog Entries
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by fatbloke View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Read the article re RP in today's Sunday Mail - don't think it's too far off the mark.
    I'd take it more seriously if Waddell hadn't written articles in the past praising Petrie and the Hibs business model.

  5. #5
    @hibs.net private member AgentDaleCooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    not sure
    Age
    36
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Filled Rolls View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd take it more seriously if Waddell hadn't written articles in the past praising Petrie and the Hibs business model.
    to be fair, most of us have probably praised his business model at some point - it's not without its merits. it just seems like now is really not the time for prioritising our monetary policy.

  6. #6
    First Team Regular holyrood hibbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Niddrie
    Age
    30
    Posts
    505
    The board, £1.6 million for O'Connor, Derek Riordan £150,000, £2 million for Thomson, Sproule £500,000,Whitikerr £2 million, Murphy £1.5 million, Shiels £50,000, Fletcher £4.2 million, Jones £600,000 roughly, Stokes £1.2 million. Those players brought us £13.8 million in investment (only 2 cost us any money to buy). I agree that the training ground was neccessary but the new stand wasn't. Instead of improving the look of the stadia why did we not improve the quality of player on the pitch. We know John collins left cause he couldn't get the cash for players. The board is holding the money back when we really need it the most. Sack The Board.

  7. #7
    Left by mutual consent! Phil D. Rolls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh, N.B.
    Posts
    23,448
    Blog Entries
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by AgentDaleCooper View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    to be fair, most of us have probably praised his business model at some point - it's not without its merits. it just seems like now is really not the time for prioritising our monetary policy.
    I agree.

  8. #8
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,037
    Quote Originally Posted by holyrood hibbie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The board, £1.6 million for O'Connor, Derek Riordan £150,000, £2 million for Thomson, Sproule £500,000,Whitikerr £2 million, Murphy £1.5 million, Shiels £50,000, Fletcher £4.2 million, Jones £600,000 roughly, Stokes £1.2 million. Those players brought us £13.8 million in investment (only 2 cost us any money to buy). I agree that the training ground was neccessary but the new stand wasn't. Instead of improving the look of the stadia why did we not improve the quality of player on the pitch. We know John collins left cause he couldn't get the cash for players. The board is holding the money back when we really need it the most. Sack The Board.
    100% correct. you reap what you sow. constantly selling the family silver and replacing it with cheap imitations.

    Sack the board.

  9. #9
    Testimonial Due pacorosssco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Haarlem
    Posts
    2,020
    Quote Originally Posted by fatbloke View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Read the article re RP in today's Sunday Mail - don't think it's too far off the mark.

    do you have a link?

  10. #10
    Coaching Staff HibsMax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Boston MA, USA
    Age
    53
    Posts
    12,344
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: HibsMax
    I went for board through to the players because I think there is enough blame to go around. I don't think there necessarily has to be ONE scapegoat.

    The board could release some more funds (assuming they haven't).
    The manager has to accept some of the blame too even though he hasn't been here that long.
    The players could perform better.

    But overall the whole team has a problem.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)