I am, however, disappointed in the manner we lost.
Replacing Thicot, who has so far been decent at right back, with McCormack, who is a left sided central defender.
Not replacing McCormack at half time despite McGeady being Celtic's sole effective point of attack.
Going 4-3-3 from 4-4-2 - AGAIN - when we are ahead.
Refusing to play a pressing game at 2-1 and even 2-2 and hoping we'll get another one.
For those of you who think it's a "****ing disgrace" and "not acceptable" - FFS we nearly beat Celtic. On current from we should have lost 4-0 or 5-0. Go take some antidepressants.
Results 1 to 19 of 19
-
17-04-2010 01:28 PM #1
I'm not disappointed that we lost to Celtic
-
17-04-2010 01:31 PM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
17-04-2010 01:33 PM #3
I honestly refuse to believe that after watching McCormack's ineptitude in the game at ER, that Hughes thought he should play him again, against McGeady. I mean, what an act of supreme clownery. ANYone with ANY footballing nous whatsoever could see that McCormack wasn't going to cope with McGeady. Thicot has been one of our most consistent performers recently, yet he gets dropped?
I'm honestly lost for words and that doesn't happen very often. The amount of times McGeady literally scampered past McCormack was ridiculous. McCormack is not a RB, and whilst Thicot is more of a CB, he's more of a RB than McCormack ever is.
Oh well, I'm sure Yogi will decide on another classic defensive lineup against the Hun to hand them a 3-0 win and the title next week. Not because I question his integrity, but I do question his tactical awareness, ability and basically, his common sense.
-
17-04-2010 01:34 PM #4
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 9,488
The Hibs collapse in the final ten minutes was totally predictable. ******rs the lot of them.
-
17-04-2010 01:53 PM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
17-04-2010 02:09 PM #6This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
what was you opinion on today?
-
17-04-2010 02:16 PM #7This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
17-04-2010 02:50 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
17-04-2010 03:33 PM #9
Cant understand why some folk are desperate to see Thicot at right back...he is as slow as a weekend in the jail and would have got destroyed by McGeady.
Granted so did McCormack but it just highlights the fact that Yogi has had 2 transfer windows to sign a quality right back but he didnt. Today was yet another day where we were punished for that
-
17-04-2010 03:43 PM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
17-04-2010 03:49 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think that Yogi may have pinned his hopes on McCann coming back in early in the season and by January, he probably like the way we were playing with Wotherspoon there.
The fact that we play so narrow means that we need a RB who can not only defend, but get up and join in the attack. I wonder if Daniel Alves is out of contract in the Summer?
-
17-04-2010 04:37 PM #12
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 8,155
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I heartily agree with your last paragraph (I sometimes wonder if some .netters are secretly into self-flagellation on the weekends during the close season) but I think your tactical comments are very much a matter of opinion. Thicot for example had a poor game last week from most reports - I certainly would not have been particularly confident that he'd have done any better a job than McCormack at marking McGeady.
Also re the bit in bold, surely the reverse is true - given that Galbraith is much more a midfielder than Riordan surely we went to 4-4-2 when he replaced Deeks.
-
17-04-2010 11:12 PM #13This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I know Mulgrew could be a gamble but i think we should go for him in the summer, at least he's a natural right back and dangerous from set-pieces.
-
17-04-2010 11:15 PM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
17-04-2010 11:17 PM #15This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
We'd still be better of with him at RB though than what we've got at the moment.
-
17-04-2010 11:34 PM #16
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- In a mad house with 3 wimmin
- Age
- 54
- Posts
- 8,885
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
To say this season is Celtic's worst team in their history is not quite correct. Not a single Stuart Slater or Rafael Scheidt in sight.
-
17-04-2010 11:46 PM #17
I'm very disappointed we lost to Celtic, just no very surprised.
Compared to most Celtic teams this one is rank, they are about as low in confidence as you can get, same as us, but so much more pressure on them.
Apparently the Celtic players responded to Lennon's talks more than ours did to Yogi's. Of course if Yogi rambles the same *****e to them as he spouts at his interviews then, again, I'm no surprised.
-
18-04-2010 03:04 PM #18
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 8,155
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
These experts also fail to notice that this very poor Celtic team who Hughes' struggling side should apparently have swept the floor with have still only lost ONCE at home all season to all comers.
-
18-04-2010 03:31 PM #19
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 9,488
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Similar Threads
-
Anyone else really disappointed?
By BigKev in forum hibs.net Main ForumReplies: 14Last Post: 04-01-2010, 11:08 AM
Bookmarks