hibs.net Messageboard

Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: French Open

  1. #1
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Moscow - Xmis Day
    Age
    39
    Posts
    10,906

    French Open

    Nadal has broken Fed already.

    Och well. Game over


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by RubyHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Nadal has broken Fed already.

    Och well. Game over
    Federer took an absolute pumping in that first set!

    Seems to have steadied the ship though

  4. #3
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Moscow - Xmis Day
    Age
    39
    Posts
    10,906
    Quote Originally Posted by Puzzle6207 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Federer took an absolute pumping in that first set!

    Seems to have steadied the ship though

    Hammered mate. Piss easy for Rafa.

  5. #4
    Gubbed, tanked, pummeled, horsed

  6. #5
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Moscow - Xmis Day
    Age
    39
    Posts
    10,906
    Quote Originally Posted by Puzzle6207 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Gubbed, tanked, pummeled, horsed


  7. #6
    @hibs.net private member RyeSloan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    12,706
    Aye well wait till wimbers and we might see different game.........

  8. #7
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    46
    Posts
    26,869
    Quote Originally Posted by SiMar View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Aye well wait till wimbers and we might see different game.........
    I think Nadal might turn him over this year he took him to 5 sets last year IIRC. Federer can't be hailed a great until he's won the French.

  9. #8
    @hibs.net private member hibby19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Corstorphine, Edinburgh
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,684
    Quote Originally Posted by Danderhall Hibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think Nadal might turn him over this year he took him to 5 sets last year IIRC. Federer can't be hailed a great until he's won the French.
    Not gonna happen for a while IMO

    I can only see Federer winning it anytime soon if Nadal gets injured before/during the tournament
    ".....Hearts midfielder Laryea Kingston insists he can fulfil all his dreams at Tynecastle - by winning the SPL and a European trophy.
    The Ghanaian is certain the Jambos will soon become a major power at home and abroad"


  10. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Danderhall Hibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think Nadal might turn him over this year he took him to 5 sets last year IIRC. Federer can't be hailed a great until he's won the French.
    I see what you mean but I think that's a bit harsh.

    He has the joint second largest haul of grand slam titles (12 alongside Roy Emerson) and is just two behind Pete Sampras.

    IMO Federer is a tennis great already and when he has retired he will be remembered as one of the best players of all time even if he never manages to win the French. However, if he does ever manage to win the French Open, which I think is unlikely with Nadal around, I would regard Roger Federer as the greatest player of all time. Although I would agree with you that you cannot say he is the greatest of all time unless he wins all 4 Grand Slams.

    Borg, McEnroe, Lendl, Connors, Becker, Edberg and Sampras never managed to win all 4 slams but most people would regard them as tennis greats.

  11. #10
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    46
    Posts
    26,869
    Quote Originally Posted by FalkirkHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I see what you mean but I think that's a bit harsh.

    He has the joint second largest haul of grand slam titles (12 alongside Roy Emerson) and is just two behind Pete Sampras.

    IMO Federer is a tennis great already and when he has retired he will be remembered as one of the best players of all time even if he never manages to win the French. However, if he does ever manage to win the French Open, which I think is unlikely with Nadal around, I would regard Roger Federer as the greatest player of all time. Although I would agree with you that you cannot say he is the greatest of all time unless he wins all 4 Grand Slams.

    Borg, McEnroe, Lendl, Connors, Becker, Edberg and Sampras never managed to win all 4 slams but most people would regard them as tennis greats.
    Fair enough FH you obviously know a lot more than me about tennis. I just think that if you can't win them all you're not a great. Who has won them all then? Agassi recently - anyone else?

  12. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Danderhall Hibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Fair enough FH you obviously know a lot more than me about tennis. I just think that if you can't win them all you're not a great. Who has won them all then? Agassi recently - anyone else?
    There have only been five men in the history of tennis who have won all four grand slams in their career and only one, Andre Agassi, has done it since the Open Era (after 1968) began.

    The other four are Fred Perry, Don Budge, Rod Laver and Roy Emerson.

    As I said before, I would completely agree that you cannot be considered the greatest player of all time unless you win all four Slams but I think Roger Federer is a tennis great, considering how many grand slams he has won and how many tournaments overall he has got. He has won 54 career singles titles, which is just 10 behind Sampras.

    It is also got to be understood that he is failing to win his last remaining grand slam because he keeps meeting Rafa Nadal in the final, who is possibly the greatest clay court player of all time.

  13. #12
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    46
    Posts
    26,869
    Quote Originally Posted by FalkirkHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It is also got to be understood that he is failing to win his last remaining grand slam because he keeps meeting Rafa Nadal in the final, who is possibly the greatest clay court player of all time.
    That's a fair point - he's beating everyone else but just can't shift Nadal. Can't even push him close! At least Nadal took Federer to 5 sets on "his" surface last year.

  14. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Danderhall Hibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That's a fair point - he's beating everyone else but just can't shift Nadal. Can't even push him close! At least Nadal took Federer to 5 sets on "his" surface last year.
    Yep that is true and I could quite conceivably see Nadal winning Wimbledon this year. I think his grass court game has improved dramatically over the past couple of years and he is not just a great clay courter.

    It will take a bigger effort from him to win Wimbledon than it took to win the French Open but I think he's more than capable of doing it.

Similar Threads

  1. French Open
    By Sir David Gray in forum Other Sports
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-06-2008, 03:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)