That`s so they can receive their obligatory death threats and bullets through the post.
Printable View
The club should already know who the people are as according to regan, the member clubs OK'd the appointment of 3 people from a list of 100. I think McCoist probably does know who they people are he just wants someone to make all the raging rangers fans know who these people are.
Disagree entirely, Mr Spike!
Whoever may be left amongst the remnants of bidders for RFCNewHunco, there ain't a single bidder who has got any cash to splash on real transfer business of HunsNewco!
Then, you seem to be forgetting, just what other club on this planet would deal with them, given their recent track record on payment????
Nope
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
OK, slightly longer answer :-) .... none of the rules "broken" are new, none of the fines are out of pre-agreed limits...... so everything the Huns have done was done in the knowledge that, if caught, these might be the penalties..... dunno how they can argue against that? There MIGHT be an argument against NEW penalties being introduced but defo not this recent lot.
EDIT... also you'd thing the Admin/RFC woud want all this on the table ASAP so the they can get on with any sale with everyone knowing the full picture?
I want further torment for the Huns.
the embargo isn't enough, neither is the fine.
mccoist can fek off, he's on the news desperate to win support.....sorry, but all that went out the door as soon as your club started cheating by paying wages and fees that your club couldn't afford.
how thick can he be to suggest that his club are being treated differently?!!! It's staggering.
No loss to Scottish fitbaw or society when the good folk wind up this famous old horrid institution.
That's a point, they say they are being treated differently, differently then whom exactly?
No other club has been guilty of the same things as them, and these punishments are presumably all in the rulebook as options for the breaking of the various rules they've been done for. I can only think of Hearts as another club that have been up on disrepute charges, and while they got off scot free, they still aren't really comparable. It could be argued they are in as bad a way as Gretna, who found themselves in Division 3 prior to their doom, and Livingston, who also went to the bottom of the pile.
In any case, Rangers are trailblazers here, so unless these punishments aren't in the rulebook the club agreed to play by, I fail to see the ground for the complaints from anyone involved.
The thing I laugh at is all the chat about "it was all Craig Whyte so why are rangers being penalised" was it not rangers who benefited from the 5 players who were all resigned last summer on enhanced salaries to stop them leaving, the enhanced salaries all funded by not paying their PAYE & NI, these players were their best players who arguably they would have lost if they hadn't cheated!
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of RFC over its tax evasion is for good men to do nothing.”
― Edmund Burke (paraphrased)
If this was a person they would be looking at the dignitas brochure by now. In fact, it's more like the bereaved relatives continuing to dress up the corpse and put it in a pose at the kitchen table.
Seriously, John Cleese territory here.
Love it :greengrin
Dodds is a wee tit, wi' big lugs. canny stand the wee Hun twat! point of principle re-Dundee ma erse. words cant explain what I think o' the wee cretin!
I'm loving the way the Huns are organising boycotts of SFA sponsors like Ladbrokes and McDonalds. They actually think they are that influential and important. How about boycotting the country, ye fannies. :lolrangers:
Thread on Follow Follow - 'Targeting Vauxhall' :faf:
It's brilliant on there. Get yourselves registered and enjoy the show.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/footbal...medium=twitter
another nail :cb
:agree: He was, funny what a few years can do to you ...:cb
http://www.thecourier.co.uk/Sport/Fo...-is-clear.html
http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scot...he-coffin.html
The picture :not worth
Talking of sponsors and apologies if this has already been covered, but what would happen with all the sponsorship deals associated with old RFC if they were liquidated? I'm assuming they'd be dead in the water, with new RFC open to offers to deals like JJB, Tennents and Audi again?
:agree:
All the arguments I have read / heard against this ruling - Rangers are too important, effect on whole of Scottish football, Craig Whyte did it all and ran away - are completely irrelevant. Nobody has rebutted the substance of the ruling, therefore it should stand.
Good article by Leckie
http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scot...e-Rangers.html
I am particularly irked by the element of the Rangers public that seems to think that Scottish football owes them something. They couldn't give a stuff about the state of Scottish football when they were spending millions (they didn't have) on a bunch of foreign internationals to cover the fact they were producing hardly any decent homegrown players. Now we're supposed to care about them? It's bad comedy.
This will upset the Huns and their American saviour, google "The Great Disappointment" and see whose name comes up!
:agree:
One of the most annoying things about the " Scottish football needs the huns " argument is the lack of a similar press angle when they were prostituting themselves to the Premiership. So they'd be prepared to **** on all the other clubs from a great height but now it's hit the fan we've all got to cuddle up and get behind them?
Don't think so.
Also, not only were they spending millions on foreign internationals, they were buying up the best of homegrown talent from other Scottish clubs, using money they didn't ( or shouldn't ) have.
Can they not understand the definition of the word cheating?
A 1 year ban on transfers is a joke, 3 or 5 years minimum, sell off all their assets and let them train on a dog turd strewn public park.
:na na: