Anyone got a link?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Printable View
Anyone got a link?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
https://hibstv.hibernianfc.co.uk/tv/video/vod/5174Quote:
Originally Posted by alihibs1
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...fadfa23ee0.jpg
Never mind the highlights...who was this, go on admit it..and what's it all,about?? #fullrefkit [emoji3]
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That's hilarious! 😂Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwheel
That's a weird thing to do, eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwheel
My guess is that it's someone who referees kids games and has come straight from a game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwheel
That’s excellent 😂😂
That penalty is clear as day. Strange that some people are saying it wasn't after seeing such clear evidence.
He does, came in half way through first halfQuote:
Originally Posted by matty_f
Hibs Class!Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwheel
Nobody does piss takes like a Hibby :greengrin
The way things are going the SFA will probably uphold that red card, give Stewart a 2 game ban and award our three points to Rangers
Very tricky call for the penalty. Even freeze framing makes it difficult to tell who got their foot in front first. Tangle of legs for me but well done Jamie asking the question and our luck has turned this year with decisions. About time after being on the wrong end of them for about 40 years.
The pitchside highlights on Hibs TV leave no room for doubt.
He should be our mascot hahaQuote:
Originally Posted by bigwheel
At the game it didn't look like a penalty.
But watching back frame by frame it is wonderfully clever play by MacLaren to get his foot in the gap between the ball and Broadfoots foot :greengrin just as Broadfoot is about to kick the ball.
:agree: it was a conscious decision from MacLaren to put his foot in there knowing contact would be made. Was it enough to make him fall over like he did, no, but we all know he wouldn’t have got a penalty had he stayed on his feet so he went to ground.Quote:
Originally Posted by CMurdoch
Not particularly sportsmanlike but it was smart from McLaren and won us the game so alls we’ll that ends well.......I’d be raging if that decision was against us though :greengrin
The boy who thinks he’s Joaquin Phoenix in Gladiator giving it the emperor’s thumbs down is pretty funny too.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwheel
Highlights also now up on the BBC site at https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45456587
At the game I didn't think it was a penalty and having watched the highlights on Sportscene I still don't think it should've been a penalty. But it was good to get 3 points against a good team.
Ours was definitely a penalty but Efe's challenge at the end should have been a pen for the them aswell. Foot was high and he took their player out.
We got lucky with that one.
I think the guy sitting to the left behind the guy with the red card is on Police Scotland's most wanted list.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Green Goblin
I'd have been complaining if that had been given against us, but I think the referee got it right by the letter of the law, which says;Quote:
Originally Posted by ekhibee
"Direct free kick
A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force:
charges
jumps at
kicks or attempts to kick
pushes
strikes or attempts to strike (including head-butt)
tackles or challenges
trips or attempts to trip
If an offence involves contact it is penalised by a direct free kick or penalty kick.
Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed."
The defender wasn't deliberately trying to kick Jamie because he didn't realise that he was about to challenge for the ball, but the ref must have thought he showed a lack of attention because of that.
Does that make sense?
It's Willie Collum, isn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwheel
Naw I think it's big G!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof. ****gy
That definition would mean the Hearts goal should have been disallowedQuote:
Originally Posted by Hibbyradge