Im not talking about tonight. Some decisions go for your team some dont. That is life. Refs make decisions whether good or bad. They are not biased tho.
Printable View
They are afraid to make big decisions against the Old Firm because of the stink caused by those two clubs and the media. That hasn't changed. Failing that, he's incompetent. If he indeed did see the handball but said he didn't think it was a penalty, the man shouldn't be refereeing.
Im bored with people defending the indefensible. These officials are cheats, nothing less. Magnanimous for the sake of it does my nut in
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Definitely a penalty, but it wasn't a foul on Shaw for the 2nd goal. He went down too easily rather than wait for Alves to hit him.
And I don't think McCrorie had a foul worthy of a second yellow either.
The ref booked five of them. I think he did ok apart from the penalty. And also missing the left back tripping Boyle - both the linesman should have helped with
We need to look at our set pieces which again were poor
Wasn't it the first goal where Alves pushes Shaw with enough force to knock him off hiis feet? It was a very interesting decision because any time a Rangers player was knocked over Clancy gave it. Then at the second the ball was played on by a Rangers player who could only have used an arm to do so. The whole ground saw the penalty so how could he not? Clancy is awkward with Hibs, to say the least, at least since his red card for John McGinn was rescinded.
Soon find out what the bods views are on the matter if clancys punted down the leagues for a few weeks.
Watched the game back checking many of the decisions. Trying to be as unbiased as I can I counted 8 decisions that went wrongly in their favour, a couple I thought af the time he got wrong that were actually right and one that we got that was wrong.
And that's not counting the penalty. Clear as day to the linesman.
I thought Murty was fair with his comments though easy when you've got away with it.
The West stand linesman was pathetic. Once again signalling nothing but offside and raising his flag to agree with the referee when he awarded a throw-in. The entire first half The Rangers defenders didn't win a header without a 2 handed push in the back. Absolutley pathetic, again.
It should ace been a pen but the ref did not give it. We just need to move on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No one on seeing that clearly could have come to any other decision it was so blatant. He moved towards the ball and played it with his arm the ball wasnt blasted at him.
I assume you dont watch much football because if you think all teams are treated the same then you must still believe in the Tooth fairy.
Very true.
There are some real ostriches on here who want us all to pretend the officials aren't biased or cheat. Its our duty to highlight officials who cheat clubs and its supporters out of watching games being played out in a fair manner.
No one wants the game to be rigged so we should be getting rid of those officials such as the linesman last night who when failing in his duty to alert the referee he had seen the rangers defender clearly using his arm to block the ball.
The club should put in an official protest against these types of officials who look the other way when it comes to game changing decisions that almost always fall for clubs like the rangers.
Makes me laugh when I see all the folk who think refs are 100% honest. Sure a couple are the rest no, they are cheats to raise their own profiles.
Linesman admitted he seen it but just didn’t think it’s a pen. Any honest official gives that simple as that.
Just a coincidence when playing the OF they're very rarely rubbish they other way eh.
It was a penalty all day long, he (the linesman) admitted he saw it and didn't give it, that's not rubbish refereeing because nobody seeing that would think it wasn't a penalty. If he thought that wasn't a penalty and he's not a cheat then he shouldn't be officiating another game ever.
Funny the ref never seen the foul before their 2nd goal either