118-110?
****ing scandalous.
Printable View
118-110?
****ing scandalous.
118-110 how did he get that
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wow - cards too generous to Burns IMHO.
Shocking judging 8 rounds 4 & 4
Terrible scoring. Boxing is a joke sometimes, home fighter getting an unfair advantage again.
I had Burns by 2 and that was being generous. I can just about accept the 2 given him it by 3 but 8 rounds? No chance.
Kelikh was a prat in his interview. Has to learn that boxing is not brawling
It's immaturity, but part of the blame for that has to go to Hatton. Some of the advice he was giving him in the corner was utter rubbish. The lad had excellent amateur pedigree, so is clearly capable, I just think Hatton has tried to turn him into a heavy handed brawler. That will work against the no marks he has fought so far, but Burns is a world class boxer. Roll on Broner.
Broner, will PROBABLY beat him, but it depends what Broner turns up. Never a knockdown, he's got his arm around the back of Burns neck, but that is the subjective nature of boxing I suppose (who'd by a judge!!) I think it's harsh to say he was lucky, as I think he did enough to win the fight, although I do think the scores were VERY generous. If Hatton actually gave his fighter proper guidance, he would have beaten Burns, but to tell him to just keep throwing lots of punches when it wasn't working was just plain stupid.
He was lucky, if that fight hadn't been in Glasgow then the judges may have scored differently. Relikh dominated the start and end of the fight. Just because he didn't dominate the middle rounds doesn't mean he lost all of them. And how was it never a knockdown in a million years? It certainly wasn't a slip, they were trading blows and he went down.