Cheating by Rangers, but not signs of corruption by the SFA
Printable View
It's a much longer list than that. Add in ...
4. A transfer embargo that only applies between transfer windows. :rolleyes:
5. Trying to shoehorn New Rangers into the premier.
6. Trying to shoehorn New Rangers into the first division while threatening lower league clubs with armageddon.
7. Signing up to a secret 5 way agreement with Old and New Rangers.
8. Pretending New Rangers are Old Rangers.
9. Allowing competition winners to stand even though the winners have been found guilty of improper registration.
10. Allowing a convicted tax evader to be considered "fit and proper".
I'm sure there are many, many more examples. :rolleyes:
The only good thing Potter has done in his life so far:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlFpHriMd8A
The Hun 'won' titles/cups with players they couldn't afford - Guilty.
The SFA KNEW this and yet, to date, have refused to even looking at stripping/voiding these tainted-titles - Guilty.
Lots of other things as well but be in no doubt - CORRUPTION - not only exists in our game but it thrives and prospers !. Until there's a complete and thorough purge of the SFA, nothing will change !
Dave King deemed fit and proper, if thats not corrupt what is?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
The burying of Jorge Cadete's paperwork in order to ensue he missed the old firm game is the absolute epitome of corruption. Farry lied about it then had to resign. Should have been prosecuted. If that's not corruption in action then what is?
https://philmacgiollabhain.ie/2018/0...ning-at-sevco/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seen this guys columns a few times now don't know much about him,also far from being a financial wizard,he makes a valid point about a business relaying on loans very 6/12 months isn't a good way to go,eventually someone will want/need their money back or they will run out of people to ask. I can only see it going one way which is admin again,I can't wait 😊
The thing that doesn't ring true with me is the bit about RFC trying to get "invoice financing". Businesses like theirs are generally cash-based, whereas those who use IF are credit-based.
Unless, of course, they're trying to get an advance on ST sales. Now, that would be a good plan..... :greengrin
I think in one of his earlier pieces he indicated it was up front financing based on anticipated additional player fees when players exceeded a set number of games they'd played. But now that I've typed it out, it sounds daft.
Found it https://philmacgiollabhain.ie/2017/1...ing-for-sevco/
Apparently they were looking for people to advance them money until the future payments came in for Garner, Waghorn etc. As these payments are not guaranteed though as they are based on appearances, goals etc they were told to bolt.
All allegedly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's what the plan was under the Craig Whyte regime - use credit secured against future ST revenue to keep the team afloat until HMRC ruled in their favour. If they didn't, no loss to Whyte, it was gambling with the creditor's money...
Anyways, borrowing against future ST sales is a standard way of financing sports clubs and is usually a pretty safe bet for the lenders - but clearly Rangers don't have that avenue open right now, otherwise they'd have used it to buy Murphy outright this window, rather than borrowing the player until the actual money comes in (because there's no way Brighton would have lent a player they're trying to offload without adding on a premium, meaning Rangers are losing money by doing things this way).
What I am looking forward to is the internal blood letting.
They owe the money to themselves and each other!!
Canny wait for the fall out. Blood and guts everywhere!!!