I like the tennis even without Andy but I can't see the ball against the red clay background. I end up having to guess who won the point! Frustrating!
Printable View
I like the tennis even without Andy but I can't see the ball against the red clay background. I end up having to guess who won the point! Frustrating!
I just turned the colour down. Sorted.Quote:
Originally Posted by heretoday
Thanks for support!
haha.
I love the french open - against the grain I'm sure but it's possibly my favourite and the one I've always thought I'd like to go to! It helps of course that my favourite player tends to win when he plays at Roland Garros.
On the women's side (which I follow fairly closely) I'm hoping Halep can get her first slam.
Now if only I wasn't working :violin:
I like it too. It seems more laid back in those huge arenas. Similar to the US Open. There's a lot of moving about in the crowd. No effing royal box either.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
Virgin media have a 4k feed from eurosport at the french open. Press the red button when watching one of the eurosport channels.
I've just watched one of the best matches of the season so far.
Stunning result just in from Roland Garros.
Marco Cecchinato, who has never won a match at a Grand Slam before this tournament, has just beaten Novak Djokovic in 4 sets to reach the French Open semi finals.
I like my tennis and I like to think I have a decent knowledge of players who may be respectfully described as "fringe" but I can honestly say that I have never heard of Marco Cecchinato before this tournament.
The final set tie break was incredible.
I do hope Andy Murray gives Wimbledon a miss. Anything less than 100% fitness and he'll let himself down.
I have a feeling it might be his last slam. Maybe just feels he'll give it a go and ultimately confirm that he's finished at this level.Quote:
Originally Posted by heretoday
I don't even know why they bother playing the men's draw these days. Just give it to Nadal and everyone could go on holiday.
So boring.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There certainly doesn't seem to be anyone exciting coming up the ranks. Maybe Wimbledon will unearth a genius.Quote:
Originally Posted by YanYansen
He'd have to go a bit to match Rafa or Federer.
It will be a very long time before anyone comes close to Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. These are two of the all time greats in the sport, Federer is probably the greatest tennis player ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by heretoday
I can't see anyone dominating men's tennis like the way he did from about 2004 to 2008 and have the longevity that he's had too.
I remember meeting a tennis coach at a party couple of years back and he said Federer played the perfect text-book tennis. No flaws.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir David Gray
Simona Halep wins her first major , Delighted for her !
Same. Great to see, and well deserved.Quote:
Originally Posted by HibbyAndy
The King of Clay continues his reign over Roland Garros for at least another 12 months beating Dominic Thiem 6-4 6-3 6-2.
That's French Open title number 11 for Nadal, who still only has 2 defeats at the tournament since his debut 13 years ago.
The stats are staggering.
Do find Nadal dominance on clay boring not buying he is so much better or so much stronger without help.
Federer dominated the sport on all other surfaces in a similar manner. Would you accuse him of being a drugs cheat?Quote:
Originally Posted by JimBHibees
Some people are simply exceptional sports people. Nadal is certainly one of these. And I hope he wins more.
Nadal and Djokovic are both suspect , They both manage to play full belt for 5 and 6 hours a time then come back fresh as a daisy next day and play another 5 hours . Anytime Federers been taken for a long match he looks tired and gets beat in his next game - olympic final being a good exampleQuote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
I don't think that's ever happened for either player. But I take your point that they both appear to be incredibly fit, which they are. I don't however take your example of Federer being beaten in the olympics a reason to suspect Djokovic and Nadal are cheats, while Federer isn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by makaveli1875
All 3 are remarkable sports athletes.
It did , Aussie open2012 . Djoko beat Murray in a 5 hour semi final , over 2 days , it was relentless long rallies , Then he came back next day and played the longest grand slam final in history 6 hours against Nadal . Thats definitly suspectQuote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
Nit-picking I know.. but when you say "over 2 days" you mean the clock passed midnight before they finished? That was on the Friday night, he then "came back the next day" (Sunday). He still had over a day's rest before the final as is usual practice at every slam. Doesn't take away the point you're making re the remarkable endurance (or in your opinion.. suspect behaviour) but just arguing my case that I still don't think either have played 5-6 hour matches on consecutive days :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by makaveli1875
I still don't see that he should be accused of cheating because of an outstanding achievement. Where is the cut-off in performance when we stop calling someone brilliant and start accusing them of wrongdoing?
I'll find it suspect when he fails a drugs test.
Tennis is one of the worst sports for drug testing. A few players have queried both players amazing endurance. Djokovic could barely finish a 3 set games back in the day then suddenly was amazingly durable able to play for hours and hours at an amazing level.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
Totally. Then all of a sudden he isn't able to anymore. Roughly about the same time as the Sharapova fiasco. I'm sure he's a drugs cheat! Nadal I'm not so convinced about. Just think he's a freak when it comes to talent and determination.Quote:
Originally Posted by JimBHibees
Andy Murray reached new levels as well and was remarkably fit during his rise to number one.
Would we suspect him of any wrongdoing?
Andy Murray has always had an engine on him and his levels of fitness have been consistent.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
Djokovic often struggled in long 3 set matches never mind the absolute beast he turned into. Shady if you ask me. Look at his form over the last year or so as well after Sharapova. Might just be a coincidence but I personally don't think so.
Frankly and it pains me to say it, quite possibly. The refrain of practically every doper ends up being they had to go with the herd if they wanted to be able to compete. It's getting on for impossible for anyone to compete meaningfully with dopers without giving in and doping themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
Even with the best drug testing in the world (which tennis certainly doesn't have) it's almost impossible to detect micro-dosed EPO, testosterone etc. especially when used in out of competition training blocks.
Btw, I'd also be amazed if PED use isn't widespread at the top level of football as well. Look at the pace a Clasico keeps up for 90 mins, it's pretty damn remarkable!
The transformation in Djokovic in such a short time has dead giveaway written all over it. "Gluten free diet". :faf:Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnM1875
You're certainly more clued-up than me on drug-testing (and that wasn't intended as an accusation :greengrin).Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
Granted I may be a little biased.. especially where Rafa is involved :wink:
It's all very murky but do any reading on it and you'll quickly lose faith in what you're seeing in professional sport, that's for sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell